Print Page | Close Window

VOTE on compulsory CA membership

Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: Dinghy classes
Forum Name: Dinghy development
Forum Discription: The latest moves in the dinghy market
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=825
Printed Date: 14 Aug 25 at 8:04pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: VOTE on compulsory CA membership
Posted By: yellowhammer
Subject: VOTE on compulsory CA membership
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 12:01pm

The "Classes fading from popularity" and "Compulsory membership of CAs" topics are running out of steam. Let's have a vote on compulsory Class Association membership for club sailors

See the two topics to understand the full debate, but in summary: The argument is that a strong class association is key to the survival of a class. All racing sailors depend on the work of their association, in that this is the body that administers their class rules which form the basis on which they race. The associations also provide services such as web-sites and advertising, which provide a source of advice and help maintain the vitality of the class and the value of boats. Club sailors who are not association members benefit without contributing. The cost of class association membership could potentially be reduced if membership was more wide-spread.

THE VOTE:

I think CA membership should be compulsory for all club members: YES/NO

I think CA membership should be compulsory for all racing club members: YES/NO

Main reason:

I am a CA member: YES/NO

I am a CA committee member: YES/NO



-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk



Replies:
Posted By: tgruitt
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 12:06pm
Originally posted by yellowhammer

The "Classes fading from popularity" and "Compulsory membership of CAs" topics are running out of steam. Let's have a vote on compulsory CA membership:

I think CA membership should be compulsory for all club members: YES/NO

I think CA membership compulsory for all racing club members: YES/NO

Main reason:

I am a CA member: YES/NO

I am a CA committee member: YES/NO



-------------
Needs to sail more...


Posted By: yellowhammer
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 12:08pm

I think CA membership should be compulsory for all club members: NO

I think CA membership compulsory for all racing club members: NO

Main reason: I think the voluntary nature of class associations is fundamental to their viability, and it's up to enthusiasts to support their class, whether club or class racing ... too few enthusiasts ... no association ... boat dies ... survival of the fittest

I am a CA member: YES

I am a CA committee member: YES



-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk


Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 12:24pm
No and No

Yes and Have been


Posted By: Contender443
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 12:26pm

I think CA membership should be compulsory for all club members: NO

I think CA membership should be compulsory for all racing club members: NO

Main reason: Too expensive and bureaucratic to manage for bothe the CA and the clubs.

I am a CA member: YES

I am a CA committee member: NO but I am a Commodore of a SC and would not want to do this for the reason above.



-------------
Bonnie Lass Contender 1764


Posted By: stuarthop
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 12:46pm
no no, and yes and no

-------------



Posted By: Garry
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 12:50pm

No, No, Yes, No

But this question is too simplistic and doesn't inform the debate.



-------------
Garry

Lark 2252, Contender 298

www.cuckoos.eclipse.co.uk


Posted By: TonyL
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 1:11pm
No, No, Yes, No.

Will never work as it's unmanageable and unenforceable.


Posted By: Stefan Lloyd
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 2:14pm

Originally posted by yellowhammer

The "Classes fading from popularity" and "Compulsory membership of CAs" topics are running out of steam.

In the interests of peace and harmony, that is probably a good thing.



Posted By: Claymore
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 2:59pm
No, No, Yes and No

On my own clubs comittee and favour freedom of choice in these things.



Posted By: Jack Sparrow
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 6:13pm
Yes, Yes, Y... Y... Y...Yes, Ohhhh.....Yes!

Sorry I was think about last night
well i have got a heart on my sail

-------------
http://www.uk3-7class.org/index.html" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Class Website
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092602470772759/" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Building - Facebook Group


Posted By: bigwavedave
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 6:39pm
No No Yes Yes  

-------------


Posted By: Lucy Lee
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 7:00pm

NO, YES, Yes, Yes.

I definitely think anyone who races in class events should be a member of the CA. I also think anyone who wants access to information about rigging, tuning, building, designing etc should be 'encouraged' to join the CA by getting their money's worth. We have a lot of pretty generic information on the 'open access' website, with loads more specific stuff available to members, including a 'member-only' forum/email list.

 



-------------
Fly Cherub!


Posted By: *GM*
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 7:25pm

No, no, no and no.

Not that there is actually a class association anyway. 

If a class association is doing their job properly and sailors feel that joining will add value to their sailing, they'll join.  If not, they won't and they shouldn't be compelled to - unless they're doing class events organised by the class association.



Posted By: Strawberry
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 7:26pm

Yes

Yes

Reason: The very fact there is a class assosiation makes your boat a class.

Yes

Yes



-------------
Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry


Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 8:02pm
No, Yes if fleet racing in a class with a class captain (who would be the conduit to the CA), no if handicapping in a mixed fleet (as unenforcable), yes, and yes.


Posted By: Guest
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 8:35pm

I think another mechanism is required to fund CA's that lowers the admin and stops the "free loading".

Build a very small figure into the club subs and make the clubs pay the CA's.

To keep the admin simple only fleets with 5 or more boats need pay.

OR may RYA memberhsip compulsory at club level and then the RYA fund the CA's that would be even easier.

OR build it into insurance - everyone HAS to have that.

Rick



-------------


Posted By: Granite
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 9:49pm

THE VOTE:

I think CA membership should be compulsory for all club members: NO

I think CA membership should be compulsory for all racing club members: NO

Main reason:
IT IS UNENFORCEABLE
Bringing in rules that can not be enforced is pointles, Forcing people to prove they have joined a CA will stop people from wanting to take part.

Do YOU want to be the person standing with a clip board telling people to go home?

I am a CA member: YES

I am a CA committee member: NO


I think everyone should join but they should WANT to join. I do not want to belong to a club (which is what a CA is ) that has members that do not want to be members

 

-------------
If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right


Posted By: Ian S
Date Posted: 01 Jul 05 at 12:37pm

Hmm, interesting food for thought.. might start looking at how I can ignore the 2 boat length rule at the mark.. the RYA can't force me to do it so it's pretty unenforceable.. the admin in a protest is too much as well.. don't get me wrong I think that people should follow the rule if they really want to.. and are perhaps sailing at an ISAF event.. but at club level.. not really no.

LOL :-)



Posted By: yellowhammer
Date Posted: 01 Jul 05 at 1:07pm
Originally posted by Guest#260

I think another mechanism is required to fund CA's that lowers the admin and stops the "free loading".

Just a thought ... how about the builders make a significant contribution?

Some CAs adminiter their OD builder licences and charge a fee. Some SMOD builders are better than others. That way the builder is funding a service for their buyers.



-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk


Posted By: Matt Jackson
Date Posted: 01 Jul 05 at 1:24pm

No

Yes

Reason: CA membership should be FREE or as close to free as possible (with CA's making their money in other ways, merchandising (I own 2 Contender polo shirts that I would have happily paid an extra £5 for), open event fees etc) with a Generic 'Current Class Assoc Member' sticker to be shown when racing and a declaration on the membership renewal form. Peer pressure (or the odd protest) would enforce membership just like the RRS.

Yes

No



-------------
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36


Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 01 Jul 05 at 1:44pm
Originally posted by yellowhammer


Just a thought ... how about the builders make a significant contribution?


In most class association run classes there is a registration fee for a new boat, but there's no way it could cover all class association expenses. After all a boat may be raced competitively for 15 years with 5 or 6 different owners - there are certainly boats like that in the Cherub Class.


Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 01 Jul 05 at 2:16pm
And Firefly No 8 is still racing at open meeting level 60 years on...I think any contribution from when new would have run out by now...


Posted By: yellowhammer
Date Posted: 04 Jul 05 at 2:07pm

Results of the vote:

Mandatory for All Club Sailors   YES 1   NO 14

Mandatory for Racing Club Sailors   YES 6   NO 11

CA Members Voting   YES 15   NO 1

CA Committee Members Voting   YES 7   NO 9

Pretty conclusive for recreational sailors, but less clear cut for racing sailors

Of the 7 current or past CA commitee members that responded, only 2 voted YES to compulsorty CA membership for all racing sailors (interesting that a much higher proportion of non-committee members are in favour than committee members - may have something to do with the admin burden)

Only 1 respondee was not a CA member (heartening on face value, but might just reflect the readership and the fact that non members aren't interested)

Some points raised:

  • The was a suggestion that some alternative funding arrangement could be explored, maybe involving the RYA in a central administrative role
  • Builder contributions could be a possible source of funding fer new classes in early life, but this is not viable in the long term for established classes
  • CAs were seen to be mainly the preserve of class racing sailors, which ignores a significant element of the work they do on behalf of the wider sailing fraternity
  • Better promotion (and recognition) of CAs is needed to encourage new people to become involved in their association and maybe try out class sailing
  • Class associations, and class racers at events, need to make special efforts to embrace newcomers
  • Some form of association of class associations might be beneficial(Fastsail appear mainly to be aimed at the traditional classes)

So, do we go anywhere with this, or just leave it as no real need for change having chewed over the issues?



-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com