Print Page | Close Window

Is this a sweat shop?

Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: Dinghy classes
Forum Name: Dinghy development
Forum Discription: The latest moves in the dinghy market
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=810
Printed Date: 14 Aug 25 at 10:12pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Is this a sweat shop?
Posted By: Strawberry
Subject: Is this a sweat shop?
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 1:30pm

Does this look like a sweat shop to anyone else?

http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/news/?article=17766 - http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/news/?article=17766



-------------
Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry



Replies:
Posted By: high-lander
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 1:36pm
looks very much like a sail loft with people working in it to me


Posted By: Ginger_69
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 1:37pm
no not at all like a sweet shop more like a sail loft like u said

-------------
Chew valley lake s c
Topper(RED)-29412
I14 1209
lightning-168
Whaam (cherub)
Atum bom (cherub)old crew (the 1 in the youtube vids)
Will be arup skiff crew aka marmite


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 1:41pm
yer it does look like a sail loft but i sort of get what you mean strawberry

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: tgruitt
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 1:48pm

Originally posted by Ginger_69

no not at all like a sweet shop more like a sail loft like u said

dont really look like a sweet shop either!



-------------
Needs to sail more...


Posted By: Hector
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 2:10pm

What are you on about? It looks great and its air conditioned. You want to see a real sweat shop

The Caption for this photo read " The women in this African garment factory look tired and most likely they are. The temperature in this very crowded workplace is very high – there is no air conditioning – and in the winter is terribly cold. They are sitting on hard wooden benches with no back support."

There are worse where wages are appalling and workers are almost enslaved (by being forced to live on-site to keep their job, being forced to pay for the dormitory accomodation and for instance having pay deducted for using the toilet rolls!.

I regret the way that manufacturing of all types is drifting away from these shores, but  I'd check a few facts before slinging mud at a firm who have apparently done a good job for their staff.

Political whinge over!



Posted By: Strawberry
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 2:16pm

Wow, how to piss off alot of people really quickly in one easy step.

Ok, so it's not a REALLY bad sweat shop, but it's still eering that way. Maybe not a full blown sweat shop. Can we call it a half sweat shop?



-------------
Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry


Posted By: Hector
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 2:21pm
You're obviously never going to ask Hyde for sponsorship then.


Posted By: ssailor
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 2:25pm
Uh i thought usually employees all work in the same place! they are actually choosing to work there and are being paid , hence not even worth a half maybe a quater sweat shop

-------------
Any one in need of quality carbon fibre work (tillers etc) at decent prices!

Int 14 Gbr 1244 'Nucking Futs'

The New Port rule!!.


Posted By: ssailor
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 2:28pm
Oh hang on on closer examination theres a laser sail on the table and knowing how much they cost maybe it is hahaha


-------------
Any one in need of quality carbon fibre work (tillers etc) at decent prices!

Int 14 Gbr 1244 'Nucking Futs'

The New Port rule!!.


Posted By: Strawberry
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 2:28pm

Sweat shop workers get paid. Admitidly not alot, but they do get paid. How much do you think these philipinos get paid? Are there any Hyde reps on the forum to respond?

 

p.s. how many more posts do i need to not be a newbie?



-------------
Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry


Posted By: Strawberry
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 2:29pm

Hyde do sponsorship?

Strawberry: "Hyde, do you want me give me some free sails?"

Hyde: "No"

Ok,



-------------
Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry


Posted By: Stefan Lloyd
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 2:33pm

Hyde are hardly the only sailmaker doing this. What's your point? I take it you buy British-made clothes from British-woven textiles, wear British-made shoes and drive a British-made car. Or do you think there is something special about where sails are made?

 



Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 2:56pm
I think Hyde should be appluaded for going out there and creating employment for those people.  Its much better than keeping it all to ourselves so that we get relatively richer.  Its time we freed up trade to give everybody a chance to improve themselves.  There are some industries which are so protected and subsidised that countries outside the EU can't compete and we condem them to poverty.  Take Mozembique for example, their sugar cane industry is strangled by tariffs if they try and import to the EU, whilst the producers in Europe have a garanteed price for their product regardless.  This is why there is such high unemployment in Mozembique and it is one of the poorest countries in the world. 


Posted By: Strawberry
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 3:04pm

Yes, and let's applaud Nike and Adidas for bringing all that employment to China, Tahiland, and Vietnam. I don't think so!

I believe my sails were made in Britain, in Chichester to be exact. And no, my trainers weren't made in Britain, but that's a given for trainers and clothes, it's not the direction I want to see sailmaking go.



-------------
Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry


Posted By: Peter Rhodes
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 3:33pm
Is it an aditional loft to make sails for the people round that neck of the woods or have they uped sticks and gone to wherever it is disposing of the highly skilled craftsmen they employed and replaced them with  drones?

-------------


Posted By: Ian99
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 4:12pm

It's not suprising that production is moving away from Britain, just a slightly delayed version of what's happened to the rest of our manufacturing industry.

Britain (or rather Europe) has priced itself out of most manufacturing now because of the endless regulation and taxation. As a result, the few remaining assembly workers in this country are not well paid, and therefore there is no incentive for good people get into manufacturing.

I expect that the quality will now go up significantly now people who will be on a very high wage for their country will be involved in the production. They will take a great pride in making products of the highest quality. I can't believe just how badly made some expensive parts for boats are - the number of times I have to straighten up edges with a file or get the taps and dies out to sort out the thread on a shackle pin is crazy.

Am I right in thinking production of most items branded "Laser" is now in China - I seem to remember someone saying recently how much better his new laser was compared to the old one.



Posted By: KnightMare
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 5:19pm
yeah but even with the maufacturing moving out there they still take 6months to get a spinni finnished and sent over, Ok so maybe they do need to expand the centers etc but the only reason they move them out there is to do with cheap labour, they shouldnt be aplauded for taking advantage of those kinda of workers, admitidly I dont know all the info on Hyde etc and on the relative rates of pay etcso cant comment on that specificaly but if a company moves its production to a LEDC country it is rarely to share the wealth.

-------------
http://theramblingsofmyinnergeek.blogspot.com/


Posted By: hurricane
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 5:45pm

Originally posted by KnightMare

if a company moves its production to a LEDC country it is rarely to share the wealth.

hehe fellow geographer

yes this is true companys are all about profit so if a company such as hyde can produce their product for less and still charge as much they will often do so. I cannot imagine them moving to the far east to support the poorer people in the ledc's (less economicly developed country for all the non geographers)



-------------
lifes to short to sail slow boats!

RIP Olympic Tornado 1976-2007


Posted By: ssailor
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 6:59pm
Ive finished A level geography for ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-------------
Any one in need of quality carbon fibre work (tillers etc) at decent prices!

Int 14 Gbr 1244 'Nucking Futs'

The New Port rule!!.


Posted By: KnightMare
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 7:18pm
lol yeah i finnished my IB higher geog 2months ago myb, but still end up using the gargon,

-------------
http://theramblingsofmyinnergeek.blogspot.com/


Posted By: sailor.jon
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 7:57pm
Originally posted by Ian99

It's not suprising that production is moving away from Britain, just a slightly delayed version of what's happened to the rest of our manufacturing industry.

Britain (or rather Europe) has priced itself out of most manufacturing now because of the endless regulation and taxation. As a result, the few remaining assembly workers in this country are not well paid, and therefore there is no incentive for good people get into manufacturing.

I expect that the quality will now go up significantly now people who will be on a very high wage for their country will be involved in the production. They will take a great pride in making products of the highest quality. I can't believe just how badly made some expensive parts for boats are - the number of times I have to straighten up edges with a file or get the taps and dies out to sort out the thread on a shackle pin is crazy.

Am I right in thinking production of most items branded "Laser" is now in China - I seem to remember someone saying recently how much better his new laser was compared to the old one.



laser aint made in china, they are built all ova the shop but not china, theres PSE in england supplying europe, theres vanguard for north America, theres on in south american, and in oz

-------------
Jon
Vortex 1169
http://www.yorkshiredales.sc/ - Yorkshire Dales Sailing Club


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 10:36pm
hmmm you have to look at the transport issues involved here. The cost of the fuel to transport the sails from the Phillipines to the wealthy western countries can't really be measured in a monetry value. what happens when the fossil fuels run out? not sure they're gonna have so much fun transporting them round under sail power.

I think that maybe Hyde should set an example here and be the first large company to transport their goods around by wind power. You can't tell me they don't have the equipment or knowledge to be able to manage that!


-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: bigwavedave
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 10:46pm
Yeah but wont the sails all be a bit blown out by the time they get here?

-------------


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 11:39pm
i wasn't suggesting that they patched together laser sails for the trip and then unstiched them for sale! i was thinking big purpose built sails for a big boat.


-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: Stefan Lloyd
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 6:52am

Originally posted by Strawberry

Yes, and let's applaud Nike and Adidas for bringing all that employment to China, Tahiland, and Vietnam. I don't think so!

Why not? Do you think working in a paddy field is better? The people in those countries apparently don't. Fortunately it is choice you are unlikely to have to make in your life. Have you noticed that the Chinese economy has been growing at a huge rate for the last 10 years? Do you consider that a bad thing? If not, what do you think has been powering that growth. Manufacturing for export is the answer.



Posted By: Stefan Lloyd
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 7:27am

Originally posted by Peter Rhodes

disposing of the highly skilled craftsmen they employed and replaced them with  drones?

Sorry but that's fairly unpleasant remark if you think about it. You are saying UK sailmakers were "highly skilled craftsmen" but people doing the same job in Asia are "drones".

The sailmaker for a SMOD I was involved with moved manufacture to China. Quality improved a lot. Delivery times also improved. It seems those countries also have "highly skilled craftsmen" if, indeed, that is what it takes to mass-manufacture a sail these days.

  



Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 8:09am

Don't forget - all these sail lofts and yacht builders in this part of the world (SE Asia)  that supply you lot in Europe and elsewhere are now the latest state of the art factories.

There are enormous savings for the companies involved in building these facilities here compared to re-vamping their existing facilities in the UK for example.  Quite apart from employed labour costs, just the costs of land and building the factories is a fraction of what it would be in the UK.

There is an investment in training local staff, and they are equally skilled at putting sails and boats together.  However, the intelligent bit of the sail design is still done by the same skilled people that did it before the factories moved.



Posted By: Peter Rhodes
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 8:10am

no i'm saying that they have wasted the skills that they have aquired over the last donkeys years to replace them with unskilled labour that is just a cog in a much more complex machine



-------------


Posted By: Doctor Clifford
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 8:36am
what a thoroughly ridiculous thread.

A photograph does not tell you if a workplace is a sweatshop.

Do you know what their hours are?
do you know their salaries?
Do you know their holiday entitlements?
What incentives? commissions?

I believe your answer to all the above is no.

Do you, in fact, know much at all?

What does a 'sweat-free' sail loft look like in your mind?





Muppet

-------------
regards
Dr. Clifford

take two tablets twice daily


Posted By: Black no sugar
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 9:26am

Hear! Hear! Listen to the good Doctor Clifford!!

 

As an excuse, some members on this forum seem to be full of good intentions.  



-------------
http://www.lancingsc.org.uk/index.html - Lancing SC


Posted By: lozza
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 10:31am

Originally posted by timnoyce

hmmm you have to look at the transport issues involved here. The cost of the fuel to transport the sails from the Phillipines to the wealthy western countries can't really be measured in a monetry value. what happens when the fossil fuels run out?

When are you expecting the fossil fuels to run out?

Maybe in the next 300 years but not in the near future!

On a similar point, the massive economic development of China may mean that we all choke to death though carbon dioxide emission and the like.



-------------
Life's a reach, then you gybe


Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 10:33am
Originally posted by Black no sugar

As an excuse, some members on this forum seem to be full of good intentions.  

but appearances are so often deceiving...



Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 10:52am
fossil fuels running out in the next 300 years? i think you'll find that it'll be before that. I had to do a project on it at uni and they reckon in the next 50. Might just be the depressing lecturer i had teaching me but it seems like a pretty harsh reality and there will be big changes in our life times. (unless you're  over 60 or something then you're ok )

-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: Peter Rhodes
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 11:05am
someone that works for shell says that fossil fuels will last for ages its just a question of finding it that makes it more and more expensive so that in 30 years they rekon it would be cheaper to use alternatives

-------------


Posted By: lozza
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 12:12pm

Not sure about that.  It could be that shell and BP don't reveal the total reserves of oil/gas avaiable.  If they said that there was plentiful supply, the oil price would drop significantly.

Fossil fuels will last for many more centuries, just a matter of processing it correctly.  It may not be easy to get but the demand is such that the price of oil would mean that it becomes much more feasible to produce.

The only feasible alternative to fossil fuels is nuclear, but the public have such a fear of it that it means that it wouldn't survive without major protest.  We are all too aware of the unpredictable winds and sun that there is very little chance of renewable energy sources being any more than an illusion to make greens feel happy.

Rant over, back to topic, how many sails would the sweat shop be producing, surely there's not that big a demand for laser sails for full scale production?



-------------
Life's a reach, then you gybe


Posted By: KnightMare
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 12:55pm

yeah ok so they dont always say about tall the reserves that they have but thats not the whole story there may be enought fuel reserves to supply our current rate of consumption for years to come, but some of these reserves are near impossible to attain. Also the rate of fule consumption is going through the roof, esspecialy with the LEDCs becoming more industrialised, we WILL end up using up fossil fuels at some point and its not a question of if but when.

Also should we be thinking about future generations

Originally posted by lozza

Maybe in the next 300 years but not in the near future!
yes the fuels mayu run out at some point in the future after we are all dead but should we think about the peopl ethat will be around then, its a bit selfish to think that because we wont be around to feel the impacts of our uses of fossil fules that we shouldnt bother to control our usage.

Its not as if there are no alternatives, cars that run on cooking oil and liquid batterys arent science fiction just people arent interested in the ideas enough for them to get off the ground.



-------------
http://theramblingsofmyinnergeek.blogspot.com/


Posted By: Granite
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 1:10pm

The marginal fields only become proffitable to extract once the oil price goes up to match the increased cost of extraction.

There are pleanty of alternitaves we should all be aware of the power availible from the wind and the waves considering how often we use it.

In the future things will change and things will stay the same, you can count on it.



-------------
If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right


Posted By: lozza
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 1:16pm

I agree that the usage of fossil fuels should be diluted with alternative energy sources, especially hydrogen for use in fuel cells.  The problem with using cooking oils and batteries is that they are not really sustainable.  How many acres of land would need to be used to create the cooking oils?  How do you charge the battery, what do you do with the concentrated acid once the battery is all used up?

The UK is committed to reducing the reliance of fossil fuels having signed up for Kyoto and attempting to have 10% of the national grid supplied by renewable energy sources (wind/solar/tidal/wave/biogas).  Its the countries like China and India that are demanding the fossil fuels as they grow economically (through hyde sails).

I have seen a lot of research into enhanced oil recovery.  The type of oils available are more difficult to extract but if the demand is there, then it will be economical. 

Another point worth noting is that the construction of offshore wind farms mean less sailing areas for us.  But dams create more inland water!



-------------
Life's a reach, then you gybe


Posted By: Buzz
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 1:29pm

Oil production follows a bell curve. Peak production generally lags peak exploration by 40 years. A geologist named Hubbert succesfully predicted peak US prodcution in 1969. World peak production will be somwhere in the next couple of years. You may habve noticed that OPEC are pumping at about 95% of capacity and refineries are operating at 97% capacity. As to reserves no independant organisation has ever confirmed the majority of the Middle Easts figures as they have never been allowed to check them. OPEC quotas were assigned depending on what your reserves were so there was a big incentive to overstate reserves. http://www.odac-info.org/ - http://www.odac-info.org/  gives lots of info on oil production.



Posted By: Peter Rhodes
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 2:08pm
he just said that the "the oil's gonna run out in 30 years" scare is not true because while they are extracting it they are looking for and finding more, which is getting harder to exploit thus increasing the cost.

-------------


Posted By: Stefan Lloyd
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 2:40pm

Originally posted by lozza

It could be that shell and BP don't reveal the total reserves of oil/gas avaiable.  If they said that there was plentiful supply, the oil price would drop significantly.

It is the opposite way around: it is to their advantage to over-state reserves  because their share price is linked to the reserves they quote in their annual report. That is why there are regulations in the USA on what reserves companies can state are "proven" and why there was blood on the carpet when Shell restated its reserves downwards recently. Read the business press: you will find it enlightening.

The oil-price has little to do with long-term reserves: it is largely driven by short-term supply and demand and in particular by the level of stocks that exist in the system.

There are good reasons to think that oil is running out faster than was expected until recently. There have been no major new reserves discovered for many years now. We have been here before 25 years ago with the famous "Limits to Growth" book which suggested we'd run out of several key raw materials soon: it wasn't true then because companies didn't go looking for new reserves until they were needed, but it may be true now. Truth is: nobody knows.

  



Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 25 Jun 05 at 11:34pm
Just a little point worth clearing up.  Hydrogen is used as a fuel to reduce emmisions, not to save fossil fuels.


Posted By: Peter Rhodes
Date Posted: 26 Jun 05 at 10:14am
If only a non damaging and cheap source of hydrogen could be found

-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com