Print Page | Close Window

Musto Skiff weights

Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: General
Forum Name: Choosing a boat
Forum Discription: Ask any questions about the sport!
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7388
Printed Date: 06 Aug 25 at 8:00pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Musto Skiff weights
Posted By: Jaws
Subject: Musto Skiff weights
Date Posted: 27 Nov 10 at 9:57pm
 Hi

I'm 15, have been sailing the Laser 4.7/Radial for 3 years now (plus topaz and L2k for 5 years previously), but I want to change to a trapeze boat. Given the apparent lack of any crews for a 29er, I'm looking into an MPS, but im only 60 kg at the moment. Given i'll be 16 and probably 65kg by the time I start sailing the thing properly (GCSEs are, sadly, going to entertain me till June), is it really possible to sail these things at all? I have had fair experience+tuition helming and crewing 500s, Vagos and 29ers. I don't need something for incredibly serious racing, but i'd like a challenge and something that i can do club racing in at least a bit and can keep sailing for a while. If i cant sail in stronger winds, then so be it, there's always the backup laser Radial Smile

So, is the MPS something i can at least manage? And is it something i can enjoy sailing fairly regularely, maybe 3 times a fortnight? There's someone else my age getting one, so the Musto is preferable over the 700

Thanks



Replies:
Posted By: Mister Nick
Date Posted: 27 Nov 10 at 10:19pm
I think it will be quite a steep learning curve, but if you persevere and keep practising you should get the hang of it. My mate went from a Laser to an RS 600 (similar to the Musto Skiff) and he coped fine. 

Ovington recommend that you weigh at least 70kg for capsize recovery, so I'd go with at least that. It's a bitch trying to right a boat you're too light for >_<

And about the 'apparent lack of any crews for a 29er' thing. I'll happily crew one for you (similar ages)!


Posted By: Jaws
Date Posted: 27 Nov 10 at 10:26pm
Haha well at least someone has some sense :) we have one 29er, a 500 and soon a Musto sailed ages 13-18, and then the rest all sail Fevas, Picos and Cadets. Barely even any Lasers >:( Thing is, they dont say anywhere what the right weight, so its a bit of a guessing game. I suppose a bit of practice could at least get rid of some of the weight issue...


Posted By: Mister Nick
Date Posted: 27 Nov 10 at 10:34pm
I reckon you could get away with being under 70kg if you did a lot of hard work with the boat and spent lots of time sailing it. It would probably just take longer to right the boat when it falls over.




Posted By: Jaws
Date Posted: 27 Nov 10 at 10:38pm
I'll keep looking for a 29er crew, but if there isnt a regular one available then the MPS shall have to do :) 


Posted By: Mister Nick
Date Posted: 27 Nov 10 at 10:42pm
Good luck :) You could try an RS 600 if you don't find anyone? I think they have some kind of weight equalization thingy (Extendable racks and lead weights etc.) that could make it easier for you to compete with others.


Posted By: s.a.l.t.y
Date Posted: 28 Nov 10 at 1:28pm
I would agree, RS600 is probably the best step towards the Musto IMHO. Im only 65kgs and with the wide racks i dont have any problems sailing it. Im still heavy enough to get it back up from capsized aswell so you shouldnt have any issues with that either. 

Fair enough us small people cant hold the power in the heavier stuff but you just have to man up and hold onto what you can :) 

Another bonus with the 600 is that the cost is at least half of any Musto Skiff you could find. So a real bargain boat considering they are quite closely matched in speed (apart from when the big flapper goes up on the Musto downwind).

It is definitely something you should consider


-------------


Posted By: Jaws
Date Posted: 28 Nov 10 at 1:41pm
I suppose if i look at a 600 i may as well look at a 700 at the same time, neither have a fleet here so does anyone know what the 700's like to sail, plus weight considerations?


Posted By: Mister Nick
Date Posted: 28 Nov 10 at 3:06pm
I looked in the class rules for the 700, and in the section where it discusses weight correctors and rack settings for different weights the lowest category is 'less than 75kg' so I'm guessing your gonna struggle a little bit when it gets windier.

http://www.rs-association.com/index.asp?fleet=RS700&selection=Documents - http://www.rs-association.com/index.asp?fleet=RS700&selection=Documents   There's the link for all the 700 documents and all that crap, you might find some more weight stuff there.

No idea what they're like to sail, they look pretty fast though. I'd imagine they're just a bigger, faster 600 with a kite.


Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 28 Nov 10 at 3:36pm
The 700 had to be made rather more stable than the 600 (by adding chines) to enable the helm to get the kite up without the boat sliding out from under. Stable is a relative term, of course...
 
Good luck with the project - you'll have fun which ever you buy.


-------------
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686


Posted By: Jaws
Date Posted: 28 Nov 10 at 6:46pm
Great, thanks for the advice :) The 700 seems a little easier, and a lot cheaper, than the MPS, and the lack of a fleet at the club isnt too much trouble, there's not much of a fleet of anything except the Sandhoppers and picos...


Posted By: Menace
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 8:23am
I've sailed against some relatively small people in Mustos, in around 50-65kg weight range and they seem to cope really well for the boat being advised at +70kg weight range, Mrs. Stenhouse is the first that springs to mind. If you've got the right technique for righting the boat, a slight lack of weight iisn't an issue, seen 60kg right a 49er so doubt very much that an MPS would be that difficult.
 
PLEASE BEAR IN MIND, CHEAPER ISN'T BETTER!
 
I'd strongly advise as James says, to try all boats before coming to a decision. My opinion is that the MPS  is a much better boat than any of the RS's by a country mile. The strength of the MPS class association and resale value strongly reflects this. From what I know of the MPS and the 700, is that on the face of it the 700 seems easier to sail, until you sail it, then you find the 700 is a less refined boat, slightly more over-powered and not as easy to get the most out of.
 
This is just my opinion, don't buy a boat based on forum advice, make the decision based upon what you like, as I know my opinion varies much from others on this forum and therefore, you'll be getting much different views, which one is right is really down to you.


Posted By: G.R.F.
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 10:43am
Hmm I'm inclined to disagree with you there old chum. Not from my own experience which granted were a bit foolhardy given I'd never sailed a dinghy before, but from the Guy who loaned it me, of similar weight, owned two of them one he kept in Barbados.

Surprisingly It's easier to right than the jolly old RS100 and I recall no less than 18 capsize and recoverys in one race, back a couple of years ago when I was a lot more fitter than I am these days. (After about 6 I tend to chuck in the towel).

But even when I'd mastered getting on the wire on my good tack, in anything greater than a force three, in which I was laying out parallel to the water getting beaten by every wave, every tack was straight to irons.

The MPS was/is another clear hyped boat continued by a few who themsleves find it uncontrollable once they're own wind weight barrier is attained precious few of which appear to be in control above force five.

Don't get me wrong, it can be done, but the 'doers' better be bulky and they better have had at the very least some Olympic squaddy experience. I often wonder if in another life had I had the time wether I could have mastered it, but then you just add up the physics of it all, and I'm a lot more experienced now than I was back then and I still don't think the way it's set up the rack widths set as they are (And i know this was the big gripe my chum had with the class who at the time didn't want it to be particularly lightweight friendly) It's no boat for anyone under 70 kgs. Then again, I'm beginning to wonder if such a boat exists, well, fast, modern and friendly that is.


-------------
https://www.ease-distribution.com/" rel="nofollow - https://www.ease-distribution.com/


Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 11:49am
74 entries to the Nationals suggests a fair few people have mastered the boat where they can get round the course most of the time... An astonishing turnout for what is a pretty extreme boat.

-------------
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686


Posted By: G.R.F.
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 12:45pm
Only 74 Entries?
After being in production how long? 
With unbelievable sex appeal for a dinghy, a brilliant builder, a superb class, some fantastic coverage, imagine how many entries there could have been had it been possible to use by anyone.


-------------
https://www.ease-distribution.com/" rel="nofollow - https://www.ease-distribution.com/


Posted By: alstorer
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 1:17pm
In terms of adult single handers, it was beaten only by the Slowlo and the Phantom- two classes that have been around a lot longer. It was in the top ten of all adult classes. the next adult monohull with a trapeze was the Fireball on 47 boats.
 
bottom line? 74 is massive.


-------------
-_
Al


Posted By: G.R.F.
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 2:54pm
500 is massive, 74 is average...

-------------
https://www.ease-distribution.com/" rel="nofollow - https://www.ease-distribution.com/


Posted By: ham4sand
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 3:16pm
shut up ;)
joking


-------------
John Hamilton
cherub 2645 - cheese before bedtime
cherub 3209 - anatidaephobia
laser 176847 - kiss this
[FORSALE]


Posted By: alstorer
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 3:58pm
Originally posted by G.R.F.

500 is massive, 74 is average...
But the days when a comparitively rather cheaper board class could pull that sort of entry have long since passed.
 
Actually (and we're going a bit off topic) at todays prices, what is the value of one those boards (or its current equivalent) brand new? Is it more than £1350?


-------------
-_
Al


Posted By: G.R.F.
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 4:16pm
Back in that particular day, (late seventies)a Laser cost around six hundred quid to a board completes four seventyfive or there about. Petrol was just nudging £1 per gallon (Why I gave up burning several gallons an hour powerboat racing)

Now a board complete of way better standard can still be purchased sub £1000, £899 if you're lame and like Fanatic whereas a Laser, what's that in todays money? I bet it's a couple of grand or more.

Very much a case of Less is more..

I think I'll go look it up, see just what they charge for a brand new Laser which aint that much different to the way it was back then.


-------------
https://www.ease-distribution.com/" rel="nofollow - https://www.ease-distribution.com/


Posted By: jeffers
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 4:48pm
A new Laser is circa £4k or more these days.

-------------
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74


Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 4:58pm

The Musto Skiffs had more boats than the Lasers at their Nationals, so I don't think coat has a lot to do with the figures - Solos are hellishly expensive, yet sell by the bucket load - 94 new boats for a class 55 years old.

Not sure what any of this has to do with a kid who enjoys getting wet buying a boat that will make that happen rather a lot...sounds perfect to me.


-------------
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686


Posted By: G.R.F.
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 5:10pm

Four Grand?Shocked

Four Grand for a Laser?

For F**ks Sake!

Good Value there then - ER Not.


-------------
https://www.ease-distribution.com/" rel="nofollow - https://www.ease-distribution.com/


Posted By: Menace
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 5:22pm
Originally posted by G.R.F.


Four Grand?Shocked

Four Grand for a Laser?

For F**ks Sake!

Good Value there then - ER Not.
 
+1
 
Jaws, where do you sail?


Posted By: Jaws
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 5:29pm
Thorpe Bay YC


Posted By: s.a.l.t.y
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 8:46pm
Jaws, go and have a chat to Dan Henderson next time your at the club. He will be a great help i imagine

-------------


Posted By: Menace
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 9:04pm
Bloody Hell, sharks in Thorpe Bay!!!!Wacko
 
Seriously, good luck with the boat, which ever you go for should be good fun, my money would be on the MPS though!


Posted By: alstorer
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 9:12pm

 

Originally posted by G.R.F.

( some old man rambling)

So what you're saying is that a race board would be less than 74/500ths of the cost of a Musto, and thus the value of a seventy four boat fleet of Mustos is larger than that of 500 raceboards? 


This may well be totally irrelevant. LOL



-------------
-_
Al


Posted By: Jaws
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 9:18pm
What about the 800? is that worth it, given i'd want to sail the thing for 2 or 3 seasons minimum? I've heard they're pretty quick to get bored of... i've helmed one in force 3 before for 15 minutes, and crewed for 30 mins in a force 4, nothing that substantial though. There aren't any other 800s at the club, just a 29er, two 49ers and one or two Mustos that I rarely see out. I'm probably capable of helming one, maybe it'll take a fair number of swims, but still... are they much fun after a year?


Posted By: G.R.F.
Date Posted: 29 Nov 10 at 9:33pm
Originally posted by alstorer

 

Originally posted by G.R.F.

( some old man rambling)

So what you're saying is that a race board would be less than 74/500ths of the cost of a Musto, and thus the value of a seventy four boat fleet of Mustos is larger than that of 500 raceboards? 


This may well be totally irrelevant. LOL


No no no, try and stay awake at the back...

A pukka raceboard, even back then would have cost a grand for the board and another few hundred for the rig. CYT back in those days. So more than 3 times the cost of the windsurfing equivalent of a Laser.

No the 74 v 500 was simply a comparison of fleet size, there are large dinghy fleets, they get four hundred in some classes still do they not? I bet those classes are the easy to sail boats..


-------------
https://www.ease-distribution.com/" rel="nofollow - https://www.ease-distribution.com/


Posted By: alstorer
Date Posted: 30 Nov 10 at 6:54am
read back what I said- the only adult single handers to get more entries this year were Solos and Phantoms. They didn't get that many more entries. Not really enough to say "they got more because they're easier". http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/classes/?s=44 - The data is here.  I'm excluding the kiddy classes, as they're a whole different matter (when it comes to choice to compete). The Radial is a bit of an odd one being both youth and adult.

-------------
-_
Al


Posted By: Menace
Date Posted: 30 Nov 10 at 7:58am

bloody mifi again



Posted By: Menace
Date Posted: 30 Nov 10 at 7:58am

Double post, bloody mi-fi!Angry



Posted By: Menace
Date Posted: 30 Nov 10 at 7:59am

Originally posted by Jaws

What about the 800? is that worth it, given i'd want to sail the thing for 2 or 3 seasons minimum? I've heard they're pretty quick to get bored of... i've helmed one in force 3 before for 15 minutes, and crewed for 30 mins in a force 4, nothing that substantial though. There aren't any other 800s at the club, just a 29er, two 49ers and one or two Mustos that I rarely see out. I'm probably capable of helming one, maybe it'll take a fair number of swims, but still... are they much fun after a year?

 
This is the way I see it, please, please, please DON'T GET A 49er UNLESS YOU HAVE A DECENT AND COMITTED CREW! In your initial problem description you said you were struggling to find a crew for the 29er, the 49er will just make things worse as you are throwing a much more difficult and scarier boat inro the equation. I know numerous paople who have bought 49ers thinking they'll pick up a crew and it never quite works out like that and they are stuck with a boat they struggle to sell. The most important piece of equipment on the 49er is the crew!
 
In the same instance, I know quite a few people who have had 49ers and sold them to sail mustos and haven't looked back. The MPS is a really good boat, I'm not a class rep or anything like that, just making the call on my experience. These guys are still raving about their boats 4-5 years after. What I'd do is buy the Musto just now, learn the skills for the boat and then once you've mastered it, look for someone to sail 49ers with, maybe crew or helm for one of these people who have bought boats and negated the crew factor. In a few years time, I wouldn't be suprised if you're still very focused on the MPS and the 49er idea has went out the window. I don't think you'll get bored of the MPS, the 800 on the other hand will most likely seem very tiresome in a short ammount of time if you can sail a 29er well. There's not too much difference in speed, I've seen MPSs trample over 800s across the water, however with the MPS you don't have the crew requirement and they are probably a much more involving boat to sail.
 
Your initial idea of the Musto skiff was the best, just go with it! I'd be encouraging you as much for the 49er if you had the crew factor sorted out but don't even think about it. I wouldn't see the MPS as a compromise because you can't get a crew, I'd view it as an equally good alternative. Any of the RS alternatives come up really short compared to the MPS as well in my opinion. Just to complicate things, if you must get a double hander, which I think is a bad idea, the 800 is the better option as you won't struggle as much to fill the crew sized gap at the front of the boat.


Posted By: alstorer
Date Posted: 30 Nov 10 at 8:23am
Aye, with the small band of Mustos at Thorpe Bay you'll get plenty of help and support starting out in it.

-------------
-_
Al


Posted By: G.R.F.
Date Posted: 30 Nov 10 at 8:51am
Originally posted by alstorer

read back what I said- the only adult single handers to get more entries this year were Solos and Phantoms. They didn't get that many more entries. Not really enough to say "they got more because they're easier". http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/classes/?s=44 - The data is here.  I'm excluding the kiddy classes, as they're a whole different matter (when it comes to choice to compete). The Radial is a bit of an odd one being both youth and adult.

I think you're missing my point, which was if it(the MPS) was easier, by now after ten years it would have attracted more helms, there would have been less wastage, as it is they attract us (helms) we find out what a pain it is to sail, then give up or move on.

Taking as a comparison, one I'm sure will also have a fair amount of wastage as soon as something easier comes along that does the same job, the RS100, the perception was that it is easier and exciting, it got a fair bit of hype here and its' first nationals barely 6 months into its production cycle achieved 43 boats. I'm sure next year will be more but already it has some wastage including the bloke it was designed for. Now the MPS took 7 years to achieve that number. I'm sure the RS100 will exceed it by next year ad it could go on to be 'massive' if your view is that massive is that sort of figure.

My own view is that any nationals less than 100 entries is pathetic and one could hardly boast of it as any great achievement in winning it.


-------------
https://www.ease-distribution.com/" rel="nofollow - https://www.ease-distribution.com/


Posted By: ham4sand
Date Posted: 30 Nov 10 at 11:31am
well your own view sucks

-------------
John Hamilton
cherub 2645 - cheese before bedtime
cherub 3209 - anatidaephobia
laser 176847 - kiss this
[FORSALE]


Posted By: G.R.F.
Date Posted: 30 Nov 10 at 3:03pm
Originally posted by ham4sand

well your own view sucks

You sail a cherub, nobody cares what you think.Tongue


And TT, agreed, but what we need is a scale of 1-10, 

1 being the most difficult bloody near impossible and 10 being easy peasy lemon squeezy even an ageing female contender sailor could do it..Wink (Or contrary French bird LOL

I think I shall start it, and y'all can add and alter to your hearts content, mine is obviously my own somewhat arrow experiences.


So I'd put the MPS as a 1 as it's the most difficult thing I've sailed.

I'd rate the Rs100 at say a 4, with the Blaze @ 6 the Alto about the same, the RS500 a 5, the L3k a 7 with the 8,9,10 for stuff like lasers toppers and other plastic beach toys..

How does that sound?


-------------
https://www.ease-distribution.com/" rel="nofollow - https://www.ease-distribution.com/


Posted By: Neptune
Date Posted: 30 Nov 10 at 3:33pm
You need to define what you mean by sail though...a 505 is easy to just sail...its a big boat, well balanced - bloody 'ard to go proper fast though

-------------
Musto Skiff and Solo sailor


Posted By: G.R.F.
Date Posted: 30 Nov 10 at 3:43pm
Originally posted by Neptune

You need to define what you mean by sail though...a 505 is easy to just sail...its a big boat, well balanced - bloody 'ard to go proper fast though

Done it in a new thread, how easy, I mean just to get it round the cans in most winds, not to sail it well enough to championship standard.

And if someone has to tell you 'special rigging techniques' sorry bottom of the pile, below 5..

10 is good in this survey.

What would be excellent is Fast as well as Easy which of course we all know doesn't yet exist.


-------------
https://www.ease-distribution.com/" rel="nofollow - https://www.ease-distribution.com/


Posted By: ham4sand
Date Posted: 01 Dec 10 at 5:08pm
Originally posted by G.R.F.

Originally posted by ham4sand

well your own view sucks

You sail a cherub, nobody cares what you think.Tongue


 
lol :)


-------------
John Hamilton
cherub 2645 - cheese before bedtime
cherub 3209 - anatidaephobia
laser 176847 - kiss this
[FORSALE]



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com