Print Page | Close Window

Laser Vago/RS Vision/Topper Omega

Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: Dinghy classes
Forum Name: Dinghy development
Forum Discription: The latest moves in the dinghy market
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=624
Printed Date: 14 Aug 25 at 6:15pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Laser Vago/RS Vision/Topper Omega
Posted By: Dino
Subject: Laser Vago/RS Vision/Topper Omega
Date Posted: 11 Apr 05 at 5:37pm
Hi,
   My club has a fleet of Laser Picos that they use for junior training and there is also an active Oppy, Laser & mirror fleet. The Picos have been a big sucess but they are very basic. During a discussion yesterday, a committee member mentioned that they may be interested in buying a fleet of boats more suited to adult training and a progression from the junior dinghys. The idea is to buy 4 or 6 boats. Something like the Laser Vago/RS Vision/Topper Omega would be ideal because it is simply and low maintainance. I would encourage the club to buy something like this so that adult members can use them. The intention would be to buy the asssymetric kites and the bigger rigs. Are these boats any good? Can anyone recommend one?



Replies:
Posted By: Wave Rider
Date Posted: 11 Apr 05 at 6:11pm
How about a laser 2000 ? Optional trapeze very low maintenece for a club boat?

-------------
           -[Franko]-
Chew Valley Lake Sailing Club
           RS600 933


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 11 Apr 05 at 6:15pm
i am not keen on any of them but if i had to get one i would get the vago

-------------


Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 11 Apr 05 at 9:15pm
I'm not sure about the Vago - I believe its a compromise youth trainer/adult single hander and possibly does not have enough room or sail area for two adults.  The Laser 2000 however is an excellent boat but would probably need a bit more care.  We've bought 2 for our club and they have proved very popular if a bit sensitive for the apprehensive adult.


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 11 Apr 05 at 9:24pm
yer i have to agree cos the 2000 is very responsive and it is easy to sail!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 11 Apr 05 at 9:29pm
ok but how about the re200 like the laser 2000 but more powaful what do you think

-------------


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 11 Apr 05 at 9:32pm
it is a bit tippy and the rs200 is a bit more of a racer! 

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: Mike278
Date Posted: 11 Apr 05 at 9:32pm
for a training boat the 2000 is much better than the RS 200.

-------------
Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night.


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 11 Apr 05 at 9:42pm
yer and the 2000 is a good stepping stone for bigger and better boats!!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: maxim
Date Posted: 12 Apr 05 at 4:01pm

I think the vago would probably be quite roomy. 4 metres 20, with an inverted vang thing, and a center-board not dagger board. All these create space, and it's not your typical laser 2 style 'sit in a hole', but designed with proper gunales, it looked quite comfortable.

I think it will be quite a useful and succesful boat. As for sail area, talking to the guy at the boat show, who was not small (if you know what I mean), he and a mate were planing very quickly, and moving much fater than expected (and it has the choice of varios sail combanations). With an aesymetric and trapeze, certainly a step up from Picos, Oppys and Mirrors...

However, I want to see more of it on the water - coming soon I think...



Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 12 Apr 05 at 5:05pm
The Laser 2000 doesn't appear to take weight all that well. We had this conundrum at Whitefriars recently, and following a look at the plastic boats, went for a Comet Trio as a hire boat. It is roomy, quite fast (about Laser speed) enjoyable to sail, well laid out and has well proven build quality, unlike certain plastic boats, where fittings pull out for a passtime.


Posted By: ghotio
Date Posted: 12 Apr 05 at 5:13pm

Hi Dino,

Last year our club bought 6 new Fevas for the junior training scheme. At the same time we got a Vision to be included in the discount. It has suited our needs very well and is still in excellent condition after one season of intensive use. Due to the GNAV it has stacks of room in the boat for and instructor and two adults. It is easily maintained because of the plastic hull and performance wise it beats Laser 2000s around the course.

Downsides include the size of centreboard case, very wide slot. the board tends to move quite a bit but I think latter versions have had adjustments to compensate for this. The controls are simple which is very good for a teaching boat, but if you race it then you can't easily adjust your sail settings. The 2000 with its control lines leading to the helm would be better. However we didn't want the expense of a 2000 and a GRP boat to get bashed around as a training boat.

I prefer the shape of the Vision to the Omega and whilst the freeboard is quite large, less mobile people have to get in over the transom. The Omega is even bigger. I haven't sailied the Omega or the Vago but as a training boat I do recommend the plastic variety for beginners, for the piece of mind of the club or training centre.

For your more advanced sailors I would go for an RS 200 as it beats the 2000 hands down for performance and fun, and its lighter to pull up the beach or slip way. The Vision weighs about the same as the 2000. But if you want a boat for shear joy, blistering pace and relatively easy to sail for you expert sailors at the club.... B14 except no substitute.

On a serious note, if you do go for the Vision ask them to put crinkles in the main for reefing as the zipped up foot is great when you're in the dinghy park and looks really neat whilst sailing. Its impossible for reefing afloat.

I have been very impressed with the Vision on a whole as our adult training boat and would recommend it as an affordable introduction to sailing which allows the teaching of all of the modules in the National Training Scheme with the exception of High Performance. I hope this helps.



-------------
B14 - GBR 725


Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 12 Apr 05 at 6:21pm

The Vago will rule itself out of selection purely because of the order backlog, i.e. order now and it will be some time after October before you get delivery, otherwise it looks to be a very good replacement for the Laser 3000, more stable, more space with a gnav instead of a vang.



Posted By: Adds
Date Posted: 13 Apr 05 at 1:18pm
For simplity, low maintence and adult training, it has to be the vision.

-------------
Cheers Dudes


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 13 Apr 05 at 3:30pm
the vision is nice but no assosiation so no class racing!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 14 Apr 05 at 11:29am
but there is non for the others to

-------------


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 14 Apr 05 at 11:47am
yer but i think if loads of people buy the vago they will start an association!!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 14 Apr 05 at 12:54pm
yer you have to give thm all time

-------------


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 14 Apr 05 at 12:57pm
yer but i dont think that the other boats will get an assosiation beacause they are mainly used for teaching people at schools or club racing!!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 14 Apr 05 at 1:18pm
most of them will be crewsing boat anyway

-------------


Posted By: Dino
Date Posted: 14 Apr 05 at 2:16pm
Thanks for all the great feedback. I think the plastic boats are the only real option for beginners and general club boats. The RS200 and Laser 2000 look nice but the maintenance and risk of damage would be too great.
I think the Topper Omega looks like the best option. It may not be the prettiest but it is big and has good add on capability with the Assymetric kite and trapeze option. The boats will probably be used for adult and teenager training and then for general club rentals by all ages. They also look ideal for some adult racing and also match racing. I'll just have to persuade the club to spend the money now.   


Posted By: Adds
Date Posted: 14 Apr 05 at 5:43pm
I think that, is a poor choice as the omega. As I think it is a bad version to the vision. The vision has kite and trapeze options too.

-------------
Cheers Dudes


Posted By: KnightMare
Date Posted: 14 Apr 05 at 6:21pm
yeah i personaly wouldnt touch one with a barge pole, we had one on our stand at DS and there are so may problems with that boat, it to the ppl on the stand like an hour to work out how to rig some of it properly, and the person who owned it was saying about the problems that they had had.

-------------
http://theramblingsofmyinnergeek.blogspot.com/


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 14 Apr 05 at 7:39pm
they are boats that are desind for crowsing not racing

-------------


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 14 Apr 05 at 8:30pm
yer but with most crousing boats you can race too just look at the 2000, wavfarea, startos and loads of other boats!!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: ghotio
Date Posted: 14 Apr 05 at 9:33pm

One thing that you have to remember about these kinds of boats, they are aimed at introductory levels of sailing, day sailing and general learning. However every boat is given a handicap in order to join in with club racing and open events. Okay handicap sailing has its problems and people love excuses to loose races like it wasn't the right wind or the boat doesn't like waves etc the list is endless..but it does get people on the water and involved with the sport. We need to encourage everyone who wants to have a go to actually have a go. Last year with no regular crew, as my plan was to introduce as many people to sailing as I could, I won three series in the Vision.

There aren't that many boats that you can go out in all weathers with a novice crew who's never even heard of an asymetric spinaker get the kite up and sceam of downwind with such a degree of stability that the novice gets hooked on sailing and signs the membership forms as soon as you get ashore. During strong wind races we were clocked at sixteen knots and beat 200's (sailed well) around the course. Plus thanks to all the time I put into sailing the Vision and getting used to asymetrics last year has paid dividends with my new boat. Meaning I get to spend the majority of the time sailing it rather than righting it.

 



-------------
B14 - GBR 725


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 15 Apr 05 at 11:32am

it's all about time on the water



-------------


Posted By: hairymonster
Date Posted: 26 May 05 at 11:51pm

dude it definately sounds like your club needs Visions. They are perfect balance between performance and ease. They do everything and plenty of people are racing them down our neck of the woods.

The guy going on about class assoc might havwe forgotten that the class is only a year old. Its obviously gonna get one! RS won't miss a trick like that



Posted By: the hammer
Date Posted: 04 Jul 05 at 5:08pm
i would go for the rs vision as it is a very stable and fun boat and could easy fit 3 adults in it and when you push the boat it will peform

-------------


Posted By: the hammer
Date Posted: 04 Jul 05 at 5:11pm
the vision has a trapeze and it is really fun to sail and is also is cheaper then laser 2000 and the omega and the vision is more durable and less risk of damaging it as it less fagile. bill a VIOSION

-------------


Posted By: Chris _Laser2
Date Posted: 06 Jul 05 at 10:38pm
In my opinion the Vago would be far to small to be a usefull training boat. It would be great for youths wanting to progress into faster boats, but i wouldn't want to take out 2 60 year old first time sailors on it.

The Topper Omega is very very big boat, and would be great for teaching people to sail, but it isn't really that exciting to sail, so you loose out on the "youths wanting to progress" bit. It also sits about 60,000 feet out of the water, pulling sombody back into that after a capsize i imagine could be a nightmare!

I can't really comment on the Vision, as i've never seen one on the water.

-------------
Boatless!


Posted By: nick.r
Date Posted: 07 Jul 05 at 5:47pm

hi dino

I definatly would go for the vision, the omega has a Huge rig and is very clumbersome if the wind gets up. i sailed one in 10knts and we had half the main flogging, our crew wieght was 24 stones!!!!!!!

I cant really coment on the vago or the vision but i would personally go for the vision.



-------------
Laser 4.7 174571 national squad.
29er 1115


Posted By: Ginger_69
Date Posted: 07 Jul 05 at 10:03pm
well the vision is very big and doesnt go alwfully fast (sorry bout the spelling) and it does have the option of a trapize like the omega (pretty mega) and i think the vision is a bit longer than the omega

-------------
Chew valley lake s c
Topper(RED)-29412
I14 1209
lightning-168
Whaam (cherub)
Atum bom (cherub)old crew (the 1 in the youtube vids)
Will be arup skiff crew aka marmite


Posted By: Ginger_69
Date Posted: 07 Jul 05 at 10:07pm
and i have alo creamed a vision in a force 4-5 in a topper plaining past it

-------------
Chew valley lake s c
Topper(RED)-29412
I14 1209
lightning-168
Whaam (cherub)
Atum bom (cherub)old crew (the 1 in the youtube vids)
Will be arup skiff crew aka marmite


Posted By: Adds
Date Posted: 08 Jul 05 at 10:45am
The omega is longer than the vision as it is 4.64m and the vision is 4.6m.
I do not believe a vision that is being sailed properly will be passed by a Topper as the visions provisional handicap is faster than a Laser.

-------------
Cheers Dudes


Posted By: BlueGreenAlgae
Date Posted: 08 Jul 05 at 9:04pm
We've been using Visions and Omegas for training and rental.

The Visions are nice to sail, on a par with the L2000, large enough for 3 but comfortable with 2. Come alive in a blow with the spinnaker up, but very much at home with a reef and beginners at the helm.

Bad points? Build quality. We've had fittings rip out, leaky boats, a rudder blade folding in half with kite up amongst others. If RS can sort this out, I wouldn't hesitate to recommend the Vision!

Spent less time with the Omegas, although they seem more robust. Massive, huge boats, which is a good thing as you need a crew of 3 or more to keep the thing flat in a force 4!

As a training boat with 2 or 3 crew, I'd go for the vision, and hope you have more luck with the build quality. We may have just been unlucky!


Posted By: nick.r
Date Posted: 09 Jul 05 at 12:28pm

I TOTALLY AGRE

Two omegas at our club were sailed this wednesday in a force 5-6 and were being bown over with 4 people in them!

The vision seems a lot more responsive, I haven't sailed one but it sounds a lot like a laser 2000 which is a great boat.

Go for the Vision 



Posted By: the hammer
Date Posted: 10 Jul 05 at 4:57pm
i agree with you the vision is fast when you want it tobe and is a cruiser but fast when you want it to be the vision also has a larger rig than the omega but is also easier to handle

-------------


Posted By: Wave Rider
Date Posted: 10 Jul 05 at 6:21pm
The vision seemed light to helm etc for a big boat and the mainsheet loads were light i found which makes it nice to cruise in. Defintely nicer than the Omega and more confy to hike on than the 2000, hiking seemes to have more effect in the vision aswell.

-------------
           -[Franko]-
Chew Valley Lake Sailing Club
           RS600 933


Posted By: Ginger_69
Date Posted: 11 Jul 05 at 2:36pm

Originally posted by Adds

The omega is longer than the vision as it is 4.64m and the vision is 4.6m.
I do not believe a vision that is being sailed properly will be passed by a Topper as the visions provisional handicap is faster than a Laser.

i did but it was ina force 4-5 and they didnt have the jib out and they are not rlly very good sailors but it just makes me look good (not saying im not with my 16 trophys)



-------------
Chew valley lake s c
Topper(RED)-29412
I14 1209
lightning-168
Whaam (cherub)
Atum bom (cherub)old crew (the 1 in the youtube vids)
Will be arup skiff crew aka marmite


Posted By: Ginger_69
Date Posted: 11 Jul 05 at 2:38pm
ye and u do have the option of the wire on it dont u ( vision)

-------------
Chew valley lake s c
Topper(RED)-29412
I14 1209
lightning-168
Whaam (cherub)
Atum bom (cherub)old crew (the 1 in the youtube vids)
Will be arup skiff crew aka marmite


Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 27 Jul 05 at 10:02am

I collected my Vago from Laser last weekend and had a blast sailing it on Sunday. It is so much fun, fast without being difficult to sail, much faster than a L2000, much more comfortable than a L3000 and dosen't punish mistakes like the L4000, although obviously not as quick as the L4000. It was quite gusty on Sunday so we had it over a few times with the kite up, but as they say if you don't capsize your not trying hard enough!

 



Posted By: yellowhammer
Date Posted: 27 Jul 05 at 3:40pm
What's the recommended PY for the Vago?

-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk


Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 27 Jul 05 at 4:56pm
Laser are talking of 980 for the XD, i.e. bigger mylar main and gennie. It feels a lot quicker than the L3000 and the RS Vareo, both around PY1030 so it seems reasonable. It also carries weight a lot better than the L3000 so you don't have to be a lightweight to get it going, which is good.


Posted By: yellowhammer
Date Posted: 27 Jul 05 at 5:35pm

Will you be club handicap racing Sumo? Be interesting to know how it does against similar boats once you've got used to it. Have fun with your new toy!!!



-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk


Posted By: I luv Wight
Date Posted: 27 Jul 05 at 6:39pm
Jo Richards is sailing vago xd this week on PY of 995, with some good results ( cowes dinghy week )


Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 02 Aug 05 at 9:58pm

Originally posted by I luv Wight

Jo Richards is sailing vago xd this week on PY of 995, with some good results ( cowes dinghy week )

To be fair, Jo Richards could probably sail a Laser 3000 off 995 or lower and win...



Posted By: I luv Wight
Date Posted: 09 Aug 05 at 10:28pm
my point was that the vago was sailing at a higher than suggested PY.
Other boats eg cherub with new bigger sails were sailing at a much lower PY of 865 compared to suggested 920 ( and 975 for the old rig.)


Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 09 Aug 05 at 11:41pm
I'd be very surprised if the average punter could sail a Vago off 995 even, let alone 980, except maybe in light airs. I note that another Vago was rated in the Medium handicap in Cowes Dinghy Week (i.e >1000?) and did pretty badly...


Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 12 Aug 05 at 6:37am

Originally posted by I luv Wight

my point was that the vago was sailing at a higher than suggested PY.
Other boats eg cherub with new bigger sails were sailing at a much lower PY of 865 compared to suggested 920 ( and 975 for the old rig.)

And what results have you been getting on that PY?  Is it reasonable or is 920 closer to the mark?



Posted By: Philsy
Date Posted: 12 Aug 05 at 3:11pm
Just to move this on, I've been reading about the Topper Topaz Xenon in this
weeks Y&Y. It looks like a new contender in this market. Faster than the
Laser 2000 and RS Vision, but probably just as good as a family cruiser.

Any thoughts?

Phil


Posted By: Phil eltringham
Date Posted: 12 Aug 05 at 4:24pm
I'd wait to see what the reaction to it is from the endevour trophy. 

-------------
FLAT IS FAST!
Shifts Happen


Posted By: Pondling
Date Posted: 12 Aug 05 at 7:03pm
visions are so much better. they are more stable and you can comfotably use it with 4 - 5 people. its more of a cruising boat so its really good for training. its responsive has a kite and trapeze. toppers are crap n lasers are too big for training.

-------------
Sailors don't get old!!! They get a little dinghy (or skiff, or yacht...)
Feva 251
RS200 1117
RS200 897


Posted By: HannahJ
Date Posted: 12 Aug 05 at 7:51pm
What is a gnav kicking strap?
This isn't on this thread dw i'm not imagining things(!) but i just wondered


-------------
MIRROR 64799 "Dolphin"
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist hopes it will change; the realist adjusts the sail


Posted By: Philsy
Date Posted: 12 Aug 05 at 8:07pm
OK, I guess I'm getting a bit off-topic in that I'm not after a training boat,
more a family fun boat with a bit of go and can take up to 4 people.

Why do you say Toppers are crap?

Originally posted by Pondling

visions are so much better. they are
more stable and you can comfotably use it with 4 - 5 people. its more of
a cruising boat so its really good for training. its responsive has a kite and
trapeze. toppers are crap n lasers are too big for training.


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 12 Aug 05 at 11:49pm
a gnav is an upside down vang (the americans call the kicker the boom vang). hence being spelt back to front. The gnav is an adgustable support between the boom and the mast which pushes the boom down to achieve the same affect as a kicker. many modern boats have them now eg laser 4 tonner, 49er, 800 etc


-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: HannahJ
Date Posted: 13 Aug 05 at 12:35pm
ah is it a kinda metal lever in front of the mast? I think i've seen 1 on a Challenger...

-------------
MIRROR 64799 "Dolphin"
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist hopes it will change; the realist adjusts the sail


Posted By: Philsy
Date Posted: 13 Aug 05 at 1:15pm
Being British should we not call it a 'rekcik'? ;-)

Originally posted by timnoyce

gnav is an upside down vang (the americans call the
kicker the boom
vang). hence being spelt back to front. The gnav is an adgustable
support between the boom and the mast which pushes the boom down to
achieve the same affect as a kicker. many modern boats have them now
eg
laser 4 tonner, 49er, 800 etc


Posted By: HannahJ
Date Posted: 13 Aug 05 at 2:57pm
gd 1 yeh go brits!

-------------
MIRROR 64799 "Dolphin"
The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist hopes it will change; the realist adjusts the sail


Posted By: Ian29937
Date Posted: 13 Aug 05 at 4:55pm

"ah is it a kinda metal lever in front of the mast? I think i've seen 1 on a Challenger"

No, the gnav sits behind the mast but above the boom - it is a solid strut which pushes down on the boom and is adjusted by one end moving on some sort of track or roller depending on the class. 

The Challenger is quite different - not sure what it is called...



Posted By: Chris _Laser2
Date Posted: 14 Aug 05 at 7:47pm
A Vago arrived at the club i sailed at today, i really don't like the look of it

Didn't see it sailing, so can't really comment on how it goes, but it just looks... erm...ugly!

-------------
Boatless!


Posted By: Philsy
Date Posted: 18 Aug 05 at 7:20pm
Can anyone please give the PY numbers for:

RS Vision
Laser 2000
Vago
Omega
Xenon

Thanks

Phil


Posted By: AngusJT
Date Posted: 19 Aug 05 at 8:24am
Xenon 1035 (Provisional)
Laser 2000 1089

Remainder dont know


Posted By: Philsy
Date Posted: 19 Aug 05 at 1:42pm
Thanks

Shame the RYA doesn't put this info online - you have buy a £5 CD.

I've seen a figure of 980 quoted for the Vago, and another thread here
suggests 1034 for the Vision.


Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 19 Aug 05 at 2:36pm

When I spoke to the chaps from Laser they were talking of 980 for the Vago with the XD sail.



Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 28 Aug 05 at 11:45pm

Had my first sail in a Vago XD demonstrator today; two club handicap races at Wilsonian SC, the first starting in a low F.3 and building, the second in F3-4.

OK, we were overweight for it at 25 stone (159 kilos), but that shouldn’t make more than a couple of percent difference. While the boat felt fast in isolation, it didn’t seem to point well or go particularly quickly compared to other classes.

Although the boat felt ‘rolly’, this didn’t translate into speed, and after battles with a (very good) Wayfarer, an RS200 and a Kestrel, all of which we usually beat, we had to conclude that we’d have needed a PY of 1060 to win, i.e. 1040 would be appropriate with a more normal crew weight of around 20 stone/125 kilos. There are going to be some disappointed customers trying to race on less than 1000 - we’re not all Jo Richards after all. I guess it will be popular as a beach boat, however.



Posted By: Chris Noble
Date Posted: 29 Aug 05 at 5:55pm
Having watched one sailing a couple of times in everything up to a F4, 980 seems like a stupidly low handicap for the boat, i think this may be the initial downfall for the boat, i trashed it one night in the moth over the water, and my handicap is 1020, which i sometimes find it hard, if not very hard to sail to!!!

-------------
http://www.noblemarine.co.uk/home.php3?affid=561 - Competitive Boat Insurance From Noble Marine

FOR SALE:

I14 2 Masts 2 poles 3 Booms, Foils Kites/Mains/Jibs too many to list.


Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 29 Aug 05 at 11:26pm

Portsmouth Yardsticks, I'm sure you can get these on the web and you'll notice the Buz is 1005. Looking at the Vago I can't see it being any faster than a Buz.  I was comparing the two boats today.  The Vago doesn't appear to have as much sail area and I can't believe its appreciatively lighter.  Further the hull of the Vago looks less likely to be as fast in non-planing mode - which boats of this type spend quite a bit of time doing.

So until I've sailed one I'd say a yardstick of less than a 1000 is highly ambitious.



Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 29 Aug 05 at 11:34pm
Does anybody know why Laser have introduced the Vago when they had a Laser 3000 which was much the same sort of boat?


Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 30 Aug 05 at 10:36am
Originally posted by redback

Does anybody know why Laser have introduced the Vago when they had a Laser 3000 which was much the same sort of boat?


Probably because they couldn't sell 3000s.

(oops, I wrote sail when I posted it: that was incorrect!!)


Posted By: yellowhammer
Date Posted: 30 Aug 05 at 2:11pm

Laser stopped production of the 3000 in late 2003 when sales were down to 20 to 30 boats/year (150 boats/year at the peak). Also, I'm led to believe the major manufacturers find GRP increasingly difficult and expensive to build in due to UK health and safety regs, hence constructing hulls overseas.

These quantities are ideal for small builders though ... Vandercraft have started production of an improved 3000 in epoxy/woven cloth, building on their Phantom experience. Sould be excellent build quality, made in the UK at a sub-£5000 price tag, and sail well to the existing 1030 PY rating.

Look out for the new boat at the Southampton Boat Show next month (next to the Topper stand at the bottom of the entry ramp).



-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk


Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 30 Aug 05 at 10:06pm

Yes, I understand the class association are making a few mods when they relaunch the class.  I've not sailed the 3000 but I suspect that the people who sail the boats are likely to get the design right.  It may therefore turn out to be a worthwhile design and suit some people whereas the Vago looks to be full of so many compromises that everybody will find something they don't like about it.  You have to admit that for a rotomoulded it doesn't look too bad. 

I've not got a lot of facts to go by but I would have thought that since the mast is untapered a carbon rig might have hardly increased the price but it would have met with such universal admiration that the sales would have been much higher.  I suspect a missed opportunity.



Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 31 Aug 05 at 6:30pm

The Vago and the 3000 are quite different boats, the 3000 is very much a racing dinghy whereas the Vago is intended to be much more versatile. The L3000 is narrow with a low freeboard and is very cramped. The Vago has a much higher freeboard, is more spacious and much more comfortable to sail. The 3000 is very weight sensitive and for larger crews it is difficult to stop the stern dragging in the water. As I fall into the large category of sailor I find that the Vago goes quicker for me than a 3000 which is usually doing a good impression of a submarine.

Laser have replaced the 3000 with a boat which will have a much wider audience and the correct PY number will soon become apparent. At the end of the day I suspect very few L3000 will opt for the Vago as it is not really aimed at them.



Posted By: Wave Rider
Date Posted: 31 Aug 05 at 6:41pm

Well i think the 3000 is quite a nice boat but that may be becuase we are the right weight for it not that i actually sail one much! Thye pop up onto the plane quickly and seem to feel fast downwind becuase you are wiring close to water.



-------------
           -[Franko]-
Chew Valley Lake Sailing Club
           RS600 933


Posted By: yellowhammer
Date Posted: 01 Sep 05 at 12:42pm
Originally posted by Sumo

The 3000 is very weight sensitive and for larger crews it is difficult to stop the stern dragging in the water. As I fall into the large category of sailor I find that the Vago goes quicker for me than a 3000 which is usually doing a good impression of a submarine.

I've sailed several 3000 opens with a heavyweight crew in light-moderate wind (worst case me 11 st, crew 14.5 st) and wasn't disadvantaged in displacement mode sailing with the weight well forward ... I was making ground on the beats.

The totally open transom makes dragging the stern very obvious on the 3000. You sure the Vago stern wasn't also dragging, but less obvious.



-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk


Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 01 Sep 05 at 4:36pm
Originally posted by yellowhammer

Originally posted by Sumo

The 3000 is very weight sensitive and for larger crews it is difficult to stop the stern dragging in the water. As I fall into the large category of sailor I find that the Vago goes quicker for me than a 3000 which is usually doing a good impression of a submarine.

I've sailed several 3000 opens with a heavyweight crew in light-moderate wind (worst case me 11 st, crew 14.5 st) and wasn't disadvantaged in displacement mode sailing with the weight well forward ... I was making ground on the beats.

The totally open transom makes dragging the stern very obvious on the 3000. You sure the Vago stern wasn't also dragging, but less obvious.

That's not light, but at the same time it's not really heavy either, try 21 and 13st!

It is a lot easier to move the weight right forward on the Vago and it is a lot easier to stop the tail dragging, i.e. the open transom  is clear of the water, the wake isn't turbulent and you boat goes better. The Vago as a design just has more bouyancy than the L3000.



Posted By: yellowhammer
Date Posted: 01 Sep 05 at 6:06pm
blimey, never mind dragging the stern, you must have been paddling!  (no offence)

-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk


Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 01 Sep 05 at 10:44pm
Sumo - do let us know your handicap racing experiences!


Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 02 Sep 05 at 6:02pm

Originally posted by yellowhammer

blimey, never mind dragging the stern, you must have been paddling!  (no offence)

Yes, we gave up trying to sail the 3000 and took out the clubs L4000, which is a very nice boat, however it is not tolerant of mistakes so would quite often end up going for a swim. I bought the Vago so that I could sail single handed as well as two up and continue to improve my/our sailing, as we are relative newcommers to sailing, i.e. less than two years.



Posted By: yellowhammer
Date Posted: 03 Sep 05 at 11:05pm

I'd like to see 21 stone on the wire of a 3K or Vago

I've been singlehanding the 3K this summer, although I need a good F3 for it to work, otherwise I'm in and out too much. The 3K is nice to singlehand and looks and works OK too with the low freeboard, unlike the Buzz and probably Vago with high freeboard which looks like you're singlehanding a two handed dinghy and is probably not as easy to climb out on.

If you want to defend the Vago corner Sumo, visit http://laser3000.lasersailing.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=509 - http://laser3000.lasersailing.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5 09  and give us your impressions

 



-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk


Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 9:56am
Originally posted by yellowhammer

I'd like to see 21 stone on the wire of a 3K or Vago

All you would see is a broken mast!

Having broken a mast on a Dart 16, which was  not fun, the feedback from Laser is that their masts aren't designed for somebody of my weight. They won't put an exact figure on it, but from the conversations I have had they reckon around 16 stone is the upper limit. Although the mast probably won't break first time out if you are heavier than that, it is likley that you would be causing fatigue damage.

One of the main reasons I chose the Vago is that you can sail it single handed, which I did yesterday including getting the kite up, getting it on the plane and hiking like a b****** to keep it flat, lovely Big smile.



Posted By: Ian99
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 11:38am

You broke a Dart 16 mast by going out on the trapeze?

I can't remember exactly what the Dart 16 mast is like, but if it's anything like the one on the Hobie 15 / 16 there must have been something wrong with it. Those things could be used to lift cars from!

The mast used on the Vago / 3000 is probably the same as on my Fireball (Superspars M7+) which seems quite happy with 500 pounds of rig tension and a 15 stone crew. (Don't think the 3000 or Vago would cope with that much rig tension though.....)

I've never seen a mast break though vertical compression, only when a shroud has let go or a massive external force is applied by capsizing in shallow tidal water or the like.

 



Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 12:09pm

Well done Sumo.  I notice you have only a couple of years experience and are quite happy to sail a 4000.  That's pretty good I'd say, so I'll be interested in how you get on in whatever boat you choose.  I would not have thought your weight alone would be resonsible for breaking masts, as you can see from Ian99's post the rig tensions used on modern boats greatly exceed your weight.

You know you should consider an Osprey - they really do carry weight very well.  Similar handicap to a 4000 but done in a completely different way. I'm told some even have a cocktail cabinet!



Posted By: Pierre
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 1:18pm

I can confirm that you can have a cocktail cabinet in the Ospey, but it is an optional extra .  Difficult to stir one at speed though

 



Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 1:40pm
Originally posted by Ian99

You broke a Dart 16 mast by going out on the trapeze?

I can't remember exactly what the Dart 16 mast is like, but if it's anything like the one on the Hobie 15 / 16 there must have been something wrong with it. Those things could be used to lift cars from!

The mast used on the Vago / 3000 is probably the same as on my Fireball (Superspars M7+) which seems quite happy with 500 pounds of rig tension and a 15 stone crew. (Don't think the 3000 or Vago would cope with that much rig tension though.....)

I've never seen a mast break though vertical compression, only when a shroud has let go or a massive external force is applied by capsizing in shallow tidal water or the like.

 

The mast was brand new and it folded like a toilet tube about one third up, i.e. mid point between the bottom and the shrouds, so classic compression loading!



Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 2:05pm
Originally posted by redback

Well done Sumo.  I notice you have only a couple of years experience and are quite happy to sail a 4000.  That's pretty good I'd say, so I'll be interested in how you get on in whatever boat you choose.  I would not have thought your weight alone would be resonsible for breaking masts, as you can see from Ian99's post the rig tensions used on modern boats greatly exceed your weight.

You know you should consider an Osprey - they really do carry weight very well.  Similar handicap to a 4000 but done in a completely different way. I'm told some even have a cocktail cabinet!

Although I have only being sailing for a couple of years, I have sailed almost every weekend possible in those two years, even through the winter with ice in the bottom of the boat. I have also taken advantage of the Select membership scheme at Queen Mary, i.e. joing fee and monthly subscription allowing free use of hire boats and the RYA training courses for free. In this way I have had the benefit of some excellent tuition and an opportunity to work up from the Stratos, Laser 2000, Laser 3000 to the Laser 4000, with the odd bit of Laser and Laser Vortex thrown in.

When it came to buying my own boat I chose the Vago as a dinghy I could sail in most conditions either double or single handed. Much as I enjoy the 4000 I wouldn't feel comfortable sailing it in really windy conditions, however the plan is to continue to improve and lose some weight so that in the not to distant future a more high performance dinghy becomes a sensible option.  



Posted By: Pierre
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 2:06pm

Yes I like it (the Osprey that is).  It was designed for the same Olympic trials as the 5o and the FD.  My youngest learned to trapeze and crew on mine from the age of 10. 

Not everyones cup of tea but suits me fine. (and people tell me it looks good on the water at the club.  Never any shortage of takers for a go in it).

New FRP ones are just being made now I believe and if I can save my pennies and get permission and have another one as well.  One for club and one for travelling



Posted By: Ian99
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 2:44pm
Originally posted by Sumo

[

The mast was brand new and it folded like a toilet tube about one third up, i.e. mid point between the bottom and the shrouds, so classic compression loading!

That sounds like a compression failure, but I'm sure the mast should be able to take that sort of load.

Did you get a replacement for free, or did they make you claim on insurance? Sounds like something had gone wrong in manufacture to me.

Don't always believe what retailers tell you, I know of a well known large supplier who tried to convince a customer that the spreaders put in the wrong place on his mast were the "new thinking". It took him a while to get them to admit they'd made a mistake!



Posted By: Iain C
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 3:03pm
Originally posted by Ian99

 

The mast used on the Vago / 3000 is probably the same as on my Fireball (Superspars M7+) which seems quite happy with 500 pounds of rig tension and a 15 stone crew. (Don't think the 3000 or Vago would cope with that much rig tension though.....)

 

 

The Vago mast I saw (albeit from a distance) seems to have next to no taper whatsoever at the top.  Put that on your Fireball and you'd know about it!

I was quite surprised in some ways as it looks a fairly tall rig, although it does look quite high aspect ratio which perhaps means it is not as important that the upper leech opens to dump power as there is not that much up there.

I'm guessing Laser are going down the "indestructible" route in the design thinking...



-------------
RS700 GBR922 "Wirespeed"
Fireball GBR14474 "Eleven Parsecs"
Enterprise GBR21970
Bavaria 32 GBR4755L "Adastra"


Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 3:04pm
Originally posted by Ian99

Originally posted by Sumo

[

The mast was brand new and it folded like a toilet tube about one third up, i.e. mid point between the bottom and the shrouds, so classic compression loading!

That sounds like a compression failure, but I'm sure the mast should be able to take that sort of load.

Did you get a replacement for free, or did they make you claim on insurance? Sounds like something had gone wrong in manufacture to me.

Don't always believe what retailers tell you, I know of a well known large supplier who tried to convince a customer that the spreaders put in the wrong place on his mast were the "new thinking". It took him a while to get them to admit they'd made a mistake!

It was a club hire boat, hence the discussion with Laser re mast strength. Regardless of the strength or lack of strength in an individual mast from the clubs perspective if Laser says that there is a limit on trapezing weight then they don't have a choice but to take notice.

As I had trapezed in other Dart 16s in windier conditions without problems then it is likely that this mast was at the weak end of the manufacturing tolerances. How do they validate that a particular mast has the required strength before despatch, what quality control is carried out?



Posted By: Ian99
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 3:43pm
Originally posted by Iain C

The Vago mast I saw (albeit from a distance) seems to have next to no taper whatsoever at the top.  Put that on your Fireball and you'd know about it!

The only reason to have a non tapered mast is on grounds of cost! A sailing school I used to work for used "non tapered Wayfarer style" masts, which were about £100 cheaper than the "proper" Wayfarer mast. They still managed to break quite a few though (tidal capsizes and sheared shroud plates mostly)

Maybe the heavyweight Fireball crews should try a non tapered mast - I've heard a few people complaining that the masts are too flexible!



Posted By: yellowhammer
Date Posted: 05 Sep 05 at 6:00pm

Originally posted by Sumo

The mast was brand new and it folded like a toilet tube about one third up, i.e. mid point between the bottom and the shrouds, so classic compression loading!

The pressure in the sails defines the trapezing moment that can be applied for a dinghy (although it will be subtley different for a cat). Can the 3000/Vago sail area generate enough force to take 21 stone trapezing worth of righting moment? Is the large weight trapezing close in the problem? I'm trying to picture a vector diagram .....



-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk


Posted By: NickA
Date Posted: 19 Sep 05 at 10:36pm

Sumo .... or anyone .... have you single handed your Vago from the wire yet? (and if not why not!).  

What's it like to step out of - I can't see from the brochure pics what on earth you'd brace your feet on.   Strangely, the man in the brochure is using a tiny tiller extension, which isn't the best of adverts and does make me wonder how much laser are committed to the Vago's singlehandableness..

The laser 3k is spot on for single hand trapezing with those ridges in the deck.  My laser 2 requires a leap of faith (and a foot on the main sheet block mounting).

PS: my old l2 also has a straight mast and the gust response of a barn door - but the Vago's looks more flexible - should help make up for no taper??



Posted By: CurlyBen
Date Posted: 20 Sep 05 at 12:11am
My experience is pretty limited on the Dart 16 (the only cat I've sailed, and that only 3 times) but they seem to use loads of rig tension, with the leeward shroud going pretty floppy in a breeze due to the power in the rig. If I'm being stupid please tell me, but how does the mast know the difference between someone on a trapeze and a shroud? The angle's slightly different but the weight on the trapeze should just unload the windward shroud, so unless you managed to start bending the mast back and loading up the leeward shroud I can't see there being a problem, which suggests the mast was dodgy. Another instructor I was talking to about cats reckoned the Dart had about 2 tons of pressure on its forestay (could be completley wrong, seems pretty high to me) but I doubt with that much rig tension you're going to totally unload the windward shroud. I'm tired so if I'm being stupid please tell me!


Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 20 Sep 05 at 12:21am
Originally posted by NickA

The laser 3k is spot on for single hand trapezing with those ridges in the deck.  

Not just the Laser 3000. Take a look at this:

http://laser3000.lasersailing.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=593 - http://laser3000.lasersailing.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5 93



Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 20 Sep 05 at 10:07am
Originally posted by NickA

Sumo .... or anyone .... have you single handed your Vago from the wire yet? (and if not why not!).  

What's it like to step out of - I can't see from the brochure pics what on earth you'd brace your feet on.   Strangely, the man in the brochure is using a tiny tiller extension, which isn't the best of adverts and does make me wonder how much laser are committed to the Vago's singlehandableness..

The laser 3k is spot on for single hand trapezing with those ridges in the deck.  My laser 2 requires a leap of faith (and a foot on the main sheet block mounting).

PS: my old l2 also has a straight mast and the gust response of a barn door - but the Vago's looks more flexible - should help make up for no taper??

I've sailed my Vago singlehanded, although I haven't trapezed, as I don't want to break the mast! The Vago has a step moduled in each side of the cockpit at the front for going out on the wire, so it shouldn't be a problem.

I had a look at the Vandercraft built 3000 at the show and they have addressed one of my major gripes, namely a lack of space, by changing to a gnav and switching to rear sheeting from the boom. Looks like a major step forward for the 3000.



Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 20 Sep 05 at 12:24pm
yer the new 3k looks very good!!  will it race with the 3000's or will it have its own race/start at events?  cos the new one will probily be faster!!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: NickA
Date Posted: 20 Sep 05 at 12:54pm

If the mast breaks blame laser.  The Vago's designed and advertised for single hand trapezing (and I don't see a weight limit specced) so if you break a mast you're doing everyone a favour by forcing laser / selden to redesign it!!!!!

That little moulded seat / step.  Does it have any grip?  I'd assumed it was for nervous kids and mums to sit on when being taken for a cruise.

......... ach but forget all that, I just followed

http://laser3000.lasersailing.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5 93 - http://laser3000.lasersailing.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5 93

want one .... now. 



Posted By: yellowhammer
Date Posted: 20 Sep 05 at 1:46pm

Originally posted by carshalton fc

yer the new 3k looks very good!!  will it race with the 3000's or will it have its own race/start at events?  cos the new one will probily be faster!!

Thanks for the feedback ... glad you like it. Jeff Vander Borght and his builders have done a great job and the V3000 should be a sweet little race boat

Once the class has voted on rule changes they'll race together with Laser 3000s, with weight equalisation for class racing only. Once a few members have V3000s on the circuit we can have a vote on whether to remove the equalisation.

Maybe in a couple of years we can form divisions within the fleet with shared starts (like the Ospreys with different Mk boats) with an overall champion. Serious contenders will buy V3000s, but Laser 3000s will still be competitive and upgradeable in all but the hull, and provide an entry level.

The challenge will be to win overall with a Laser ... I'm keeping mine (Class Secretary) so we won't sacrifice older boats. Expect Laser 3000 values to remain solid with the new life in the class.

Superb result!!!



-------------
Laser 3000 @ Leigh & Lowton SC
www.3000class.org.uk


Posted By: Sumo
Date Posted: 20 Sep 05 at 2:03pm
[QUOTE=NickA]

If the mast breaks blame laser.  The Vago's designed and advertised for single hand trapezing (and I don't see a weight limit specced) so if you break a mast you're doing everyone a favour by forcing laser / selden to redesign it!!!!!

/QUOTE]

I had a conversation with Laser on this issue and they don't recomend someone of my not inconsiderable weight trapezing as it will over stress the mast. In fact with my weight conditions would have to be ballistic before I would be able to go out fully on the trapeze any way, so hiking out is more than adequate!




Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com