Print Page | Close Window

Topper Spice

Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: Dinghy classes
Forum Name: Dinghy development
Forum Discription: The latest moves in the dinghy market
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=555
Printed Date: 14 Aug 25 at 10:04am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Topper Spice
Posted By: Wave Rider
Subject: Topper Spice
Date Posted: 15 Mar 05 at 8:32pm

I was looking at a site and randomly looking at Topper Spice and Iso and i noticed that the spice PN is 920 and the ISO is 926.

 

The Spice has a double Trapeze therefore surely has more sail area so how the hell can there only be a diffrence of 6....................an ISO isnt a massively fast boat but normally a twin wire would be quite fast so..............??????????



-------------
           -[Franko]-
Chew Valley Lake Sailing Club
           RS600 933



Replies:
Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 15 Mar 05 at 8:51pm
the spice is just a twin trapez buzz to put it simply!!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: jamesint505
Date Posted: 15 Mar 05 at 8:56pm
I dont know last time i sailed an iso it seemed pretty fast .we were even planing upwind though i am over sixteen stone and was crewing so that might have helped the righting moment .didnt point just stood on my tiptoes and got the thing flying .then the rudder broke!!!

-------------
505 7567


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 15 Mar 05 at 9:13pm

the spice hasnt got that much sail area tho!!!!1



-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 15 Mar 05 at 10:42pm
Yes I Thought the Spice was a twin wire Buz.  But I had a close look at the Dinghy Show and the hull molding is different.  There were some very helpful and enthusiastic people on both stands and I get the feeling they are underated boats but they are both not big in the sail area department whereas the ISO carries quite a bit of sail.  So I'm not surprised at the PYs.


Posted By: ssailor
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 10:28am
Last year I raced a spoce for the whole season, why the PN is as low as the iso is down to its weight and thus its performance in light winds. It is hard to get the kite work decently in light light winds and due to its weight can get beaten by vareos etc.

In anything above a 3 it starts to perform and when your in anything above a 4 it will plane upwind! The boat is blindingly quick in a 5-7 as long as you can sail it properly, we were at the welsh sailing games in a 7 + and were going as fast as the 420s upwind, we then decided to bear off the wind slightly and doubled our speed if not more!!

Any one who is looking to move from a single wire boat to a twin wire boat then the spice is an excellent boat, its a pity it didnt take off properly!




-------------
Any one in need of quality carbon fibre work (tillers etc) at decent prices!

Int 14 Gbr 1244 'Nucking Futs'

The New Port rule!!.


Posted By: ssailor
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 10:37am
In fact here a good pic of us racing last year in a force 6 good fun!




-------------
Any one in need of quality carbon fibre work (tillers etc) at decent prices!

Int 14 Gbr 1244 'Nucking Futs'

The New Port rule!!.


Posted By: Wave Rider
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 11:27am
Cool ooks good i wolud like a go on one of them because lots of the other twin wire boats look very difficult to control !

-------------
           -[Franko]-
Chew Valley Lake Sailing Club
           RS600 933


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 1:20pm
I used to be really interested in Topper Spice's but after having been sailing for a few years i have still never seen one on the water. Seems a bit of a shame really as they look like quite fun boats to sail... shame about their weight! If it was more cherub weight it would be a real pocket rocket!

Talking of cherubs... i thought i'd include a photo of the first new rules cherub to hit the water. Just wait and see how fast they are downwind in a 5 or 6




-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 1:30pm

I must agree with you on that one Tim, a UK rules cherub hull is 50kg, a spice bare hull is 80kg! thats without any of that metal and plastic, masts, foils etc! And now being turbo charged, it can reel in a 49er easy.

Im moving back to cherubs now after a stint in the 49er, feeling its not as fun to sail as a cherub!

Andy

This is my old cheurb, a twin wire, 04 rules boat - WAY more fun than plastic!



Posted By: ssailor
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 5:03pm
Yeh the spice is fun and very stable but as with any design it has its own little ways!

The weight is the main disadvantage the hull is a good shape it planes pretty easy but at the end of the day my 14 is longer has more sail area and fully rigged still ways less than the bare spice hull!


-------------
Any one in need of quality carbon fibre work (tillers etc) at decent prices!

Int 14 Gbr 1244 'Nucking Futs'

The New Port rule!!.


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 5:20pm
the compared to a cherub the spice looks like a fatboat that wouldnt move!!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 5:32pm

Funny you should say that..................... The spice was a good idea, if only it had a carbon hull and carbon rig, and perhaps a lil more rag!



Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 5:41pm
yer thinking about it the spice could have done with the rig off the bosss maybe !

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 5:49pm
Perhaps, but itll still weight a tonne!! But at least they did one thing right with twin wire, unlike the B14 & 59er (grandads version of a skiff  )

-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 5:53pm
the b14 is a cool boat but i sort of agee with you about the 59er

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 5:55pm
Originally posted by ssailor

the hull is a good shape


There are those who would dispute that statement [grin]


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 6:05pm

HAHA, I must agree with you Mr Champ

See you on the water



-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 6:33pm
I think maybe comparing the Spice and the Cherub is a little unfair! The Cherub is an extreme development class, and the Spice was designed as an easy way to start twin trapezing and not fall in ALL the time, just as the Buzz was for single wire asymmetrics. For those of us who generally sail slow, tactical boats, the Buzz seems very quick and uses skills we don't often get to use. Cherubs, 29ers etc offer a much steeper learning curve, and are less small pond friendly, as they are far less forgiving. I'm sure the Spice fufills the same role, or would have done if Topper had done their job properly...I don't think it was ever intended as a really radical boat, or they wouldn't have used the Buzz hull moulding (the internal moulding was changed). The Boss was Topper's extreme boat, and was hit by poor marketing and the 49er, which outdated it overnight.


Posted By: Mike278
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 7:24pm
I think that the spice would be a good first twin wire boat, as it is more forgiving than say a cherub or I14, but will still teach you the basic skills to move on to more extreme boats.

-------------
Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night.


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 8:04pm
yer but the cherub is the only boat to compare it with realy

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 16 Mar 05 at 10:41pm

the problem with the spice is that if you can sail one you can probably sail a rs800 and that is a much beter boat and there is a beter fleat to race agenst

I like the look of the cherab but I have never seen them out in large numbers

 



-------------


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 1:45am

Cherubs now have the same rag as an 800 but half the weight! Even on old rules I could pace an 800 upwind, and then mince it downwind!

The cherub fleet is quickly growing again with the new rule change, so its all go go go!



-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:22am
Thats good newes they have alwase looked a good boat to sail grate fun to sail if they get a good fleat lots of people will want to sail them I do

-------------


Posted By: hurricane
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 12:27pm
does anyone else think that the topper boats spice, boss, iso, buzz, byte, 5.9 were or are still all better boats than others on the market but due to bad avertising never sold well as they should have done!


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 12:48pm

NO! the entire tupper-wear fleet is overpriced and underpowered! they all weigh and absolute tonne, ive sailed every boat you mentioned apart from the byte, but they are not responsive and give your back real grief when launching off a slipway! They tend to plow through waves rather than riding over them. All beit the 5.9 which is a cat and a true machine, but past its time. Its a nice boat, but sucess went to the tornado and now all the F18's.

ps, im selling my 49er - going back to cherubs! Anyone interested, its priced to sell (3800) and can be found on http://www.boatsandoutboards.co.uk - www.boatsandoutboards.co.uk  



-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 1:08pm

In a time where people want more and more power and less and lees waight the topper fleat do not com up to scrach they are to hevey and don't have enoufe power

people say that the new byte is more pawafall but with the carbon mast it losses most of it's power and the max waight that you can sail and be competative is 9.5-10 stone so it still is a boat for light waites what a shame the hull is so nice on them give it more power



-------------


Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 1:23pm
Originally posted by hurricane

does anyone else think that the topper boats spice, boss, iso, buzz, byte, 5.9 were or are still all better boats than others on the market but due to bad avertising never sold well as they should have done!


The Byte's a nice boat I think. Only sailed one with the old rig though. We used to have one at our club as a trainer. It was my preference for the ladies. I wish we still had it, better than the Laser in that role IMHO. (Can we have it back please Byte Association [grin])

Of the others I've only sailed the Boss and Iso. Only sailed a Boss the once, not anxious for a second go. To me it was just horrible, but I don't like big boats anyway, so I was never going to be very enthusiastic.

I've sailed ISOs a reasonable amount. For me they're pretty ordinary, except that ergonomically for me they're completely horrible - lumps bumps and bruises everywhere!

The trouble with those boats was that they were based on 14 technology just before the I14s did the amalagamation thing and caught up 25+ years of development in one big hit. Advertising/Marketing seemed to be the one thing they did have going for them. By contrast the Bethwaite and RS boats are based on more contemporary development class experience.

My favourite two handed SMOD is without doubt the 29er, but I've got a lot of time for the RS400 which is an excellent club racer for middle sized reservoirs like the one I sail at. I haven't been in a 59er. Of SMOD singlehanders I think the RS300 stands out (but I loved the Megabyte when I sailed in one in a drifter). Your mileage will vary!



Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 1:50pm

Thay are all just to big and they all have to much waite when you are sailing next to the boss it looks like a war ship we want small light boats that extremaly fast



-------------


Posted By: bISOtted
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 2:34pm
this is all true but everyone seems to forget that the iso was the first one design assymetric and i think topper didnt do a bad job and i dont know why everyone seems to have these expectations of the iso to be a cutting edge design when it clealy isnt people seem to forget its a 15 year old design


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 4:34pm

i know that it is an old boat and that is the problem it is time to sell them and get newer and faster boats

 



-------------


Posted By: Granite
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 4:37pm

Originally posted by bISOtted

everyone seems to have these expectations of the iso to be a cutting edge design when it clealy isnt

People have these expectations because the ISO was marketed very hard as being High performance, cutting edge and the best thing since sliced bread and it never was.

The thing that I found most annoying about them at the time they first came out was having to sail in the Isometric class at opens rather than the Asymetric (Iso as a prefix meanins "same" therefore Isometric means symetric)



-------------
If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right


Posted By: LocoP
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 6:30pm

I agree that Iso's (and other topprer products) arent and werent the most upto date boats ever produced but they did at least help to open the door for more skiff orientated boats. As a result the likes of the 9ers, B14s, 800 are now acceptable boats to the sailing public. Without it and perhaps the 5 tonner we could still be sailing significantly different classes around triangular courses... the Cherub would still be assymetric though

 



-------------
Get your heart racing


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 6:46pm

if you get rid of all the boat like the iso then you are left with thing like the 800 and all that will mean that will be left with is biger fleats in the good boats and we can look back on the rest IE iso they will be in our memories hopfaly we will be able foget them



-------------


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:06pm
Well dont get an 800 - get a cherub! And if your thinking about going plastic, u may want to book yourself in now and get the padding you deserve

-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:15pm

there are better fleats in the 800 so i still think the 800 is beter but when the cherub gets a beter fleat i will think about one but i am staying in my 29er for now



-------------


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:28pm

Dude, your the kinda people we need - you have seen the light and realise that cherubs rule! So if you get one, then the fleet will grow!

Or failing that, buy my 49er so I can get a cherub again!



-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:35pm
That is correct Andrew, It needs people to make the jump forward themselves because if everyone took the "sheep approach" then nobody would ever move class.

Just needs some of you guys to raise one hand, say "i'm the big guy" and make the big jump (forward) to cherubs. Its a big decision, your life will never be the same after sailing one and your respect for other forms of sailing dinghy will disappear over night!



(a totally NON-biased opinion)


-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:39pm

But people want to sail boat that have big fleats and that will not hapan over knight which is a shame because it is a brilant boat

 



-------------


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:39pm
Indeed Timothy, this is the reason for selling the 9er - its just pants compared to 12ft! Anything longer is just a waste wouldnt you say? Just because most SMOD boats are longer and wider, it certainly doesnt mean that they are more fun.

-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:40pm
yer the cherub is nice but development classes arnt for everyone!! 

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:44pm

i think that most people would like to sail one but they look like a boat for lite waites



-------------


Posted By: Yann
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:47pm
what is the weight range for a cherub?


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:48pm

This is true, but im 12st, and my crew was about 11 - and on old rules we cud twin upwind pacing an 800 in 10-15 knots of wind, and den piss all over them downwind! so fat basterds can sail em too, or get a small crew, Ben Brown has lil ole daryl    And on new rules they seem to be able to twin in no wind?!



-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:49pm
yer they are a boat for light weights but the cherub is just like a mini international14!! 

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:52pm

what fast wet and sceary untill they capeszie

 



-------------


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:52pm
I was a little dubious of the fact that any boat i bought would soon become outdated and therefore be obsolete, but i think that it is quite the opposite. I have recently bought my first cherub (and first boat) which is a 15 year old cherub and am already blown away by the performance.

All the seperate rule changes have different handicaps so if you're not class racing you can have a handicap which suits your boat, (unlike a 15 year old laser which has to compete on a level playing field with a brand new laser). I realise that the cherub is not everyones cup of tea as they have a reputation for being held together with ductape etc but you become much more attached to your boat if you have had something to do with building it! Less excuses after coming off the water if you're trying to blame the idiot that made it if it's in fact you! (but don't forget about the new RMW cherub which will be on the "shelves" soon )



-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:54pm
ps.... i'm 13 stone with a moderate weight helm and sailed the other day and we were still planing downwind in much less than a 3! There's hope for us all!



-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:55pm

that's good they will be easer to get hold of then

 



-------------


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:55pm
I also have a Early 90's rules set up at the moment so that equates to a handicap of about 1050 and even that's certainly not shy of going warp speed off the wind!!

-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:57pm
yer but when you are in a development class quite alot of people depend on tecnology and not there sailing skill.  so in the 800 class the racing is all on a leval playing feild!!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:58pm

i hard that the cherab on handy cap they wipe the face off of anything else

 



-------------


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:59pm
what the 800?

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 7:59pm
My old wooden cherub was built around 20 years ago and with this handicap of 1050 could still undertake an iso downwind and that was with a totally shagged kite!

-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:00pm

also in a boat like the 800 the winner is not the porson with the bigges overdraft



-------------


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:02pm
yer very true!!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:03pm
Im a student, but am going back to cherubs and can still afford a brand new set of new rules sails, they are only £1400 complete and custom made! Admitadly I dont drink like most other students, but this enables me to afford a sweet boat! This is the joy of cherubs, u make em suit you! And the racing is all down to the sailor - believe your thinking of the I14 where you need £15k to get started at the top!

-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:03pm
overdraft?! was it really THAT obvious that i was a student?! 

-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:04pm
how much is a twin tropes cherab anyway not that im going to get one

-------------


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:05pm
3500 new and made by a builder

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:07pm

1400 for a set of sails the 29er are cheaper than that

 



-------------


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:09pm

a new boat is not that bad thow you will pay 3500 for a scond hand 29er

 



-------------


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:09pm
second hand cherubs are about 2000!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:10pm

thats about what i pad for 29er but it is an old one 1999



-------------


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:12pm
Well that is the link to the second hand section on the Cherub Class Association website.

http://www.sailingsource.com/cherub/chshand.htm

I bought my boat for £700 and that will soon be twin wire and 2004 rules (eg not the very new larger sail area rules) with a bit of carbon work and a little modification. So in total I will have spent around £1k. The multi nationals winner "norwegian blue" was recently sold for £900 and that was also full 2004 rules so there are some bargains to be had.


-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:14pm
yer but you have to keep spending money on the most uptodate sails masts ect. 

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: LocoP
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:18pm

Theres more to just owning a cherub than just turning up and sailing at events. Sure other classes have bigger fleets, but cherubs are all about having fun and I think that something thats been forgotten in other classes. We even hold occasional open meetings without racing just because its good to swap boats, sail with other people and exchange ideas.

Like others Im biased but its a great class thats really going places at the momment. We have at least three pro builders at present that could knock out a hull fairly cheaply.

I dont believe cheque book sailing exists in development classes any more than in a SMOD class. You wouldnt expect to win any OD class with an old boat and old sails and the latest "race pack" from RS.



-------------
Get your heart racing


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:18pm
The latest rules that got voted in are the new 2005 rules and before that, the last major rule change was 1997 (feel free to step in and correct me if anyone knows any different). The latest rules have been voted in by the class and will not be considered for an update for at least 5 years.

So you saying that is like saying that you're not going to buy a new mast or sails for the next 5 years and stay at the top of the fleet?


-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:19pm

just get a 800 and sail that without spending any more money and you stay where you are in the fleet or you will get better unless you something wrong with a cherab you have to spend to stay at the front



-------------


Posted By: ssailor
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:20pm
One thing that is definetly obvious about the differences between the spice,iso,boss etc is their weight - also due to this their handling - downwind the spice was night to helm if a bit heavy on helm due to the amount of the boat still in the water even when planing! However my 14 is like a laser downwind - really light and easy to steer and gives you more confidence to push a bit faster even though youve got the masthead 30sqm + kite up!

We always beat the 800s - upwind the hydrofoil rudder helps alot - downwind pure speed!! - does any one know the pn number of the 800? And are any of the cherubs tried t foil rudders yet?


-------------
Any one in need of quality carbon fibre work (tillers etc) at decent prices!

Int 14 Gbr 1244 'Nucking Futs'

The New Port rule!!.


Posted By: LocoP
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:21pm

In five years time some manufacture will bring out a new RS800 or what ever and people will sell there boats and get on. The difference with Dev classes is that you stay get a new boat which just happens to be the same class as your old boat. And keep sailing with the mates you made over the last five years.

 



-------------
Get your heart racing


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:24pm

you sail with your mates and at the same time you are all going bankrupt



-------------


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:49pm
that remains to be seen.... Guess it'll inspire me to do well at uni so i can afford to fund my cherub addiction eh?! 

-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:53pm

the cherab is a boat that people keep on up grading and they lose there money the only ones that benafit anr the people that are selling the upgrades



-------------


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:54pm
only if you're not classing amazing enjoyment as a benefit?

-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 8:57pm

you can get the feeling of a chearb by sailing a 800 and you do not have to do lots of up grades befor you are at the front of the fleet

 



-------------


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 9:03pm
are you saying that from experience? I've only sailed my cherub a few times and its like nothing i've ever sailed before. Keeps you on your toes all the time and the smallest degrees of heel can make major impacts on your speed.

I think that it's a cherub thing. You don't quite know the feeling untill you've tried it.


-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 9:07pm

im not saying it's a bad boat it looks grate fun to sail and i would get one if they had large fleets and you did not need to keep upgrading all the time

 



-------------


Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 9:11pm
agreed buddy. i just love sailing full stop. hope to see you on the race course sometime... probably a few times a race, you going past upwind.. and me going past again downwind 

-------------
http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 9:41pm
If you fink a cherub is more expensive than an 800 then you are truely wrong! You can get a twin wire cherub for under £2k and race it at the top of the fleet - you need in excess of £5k for an 800 and then still need new sails to be at the top. and if you damage it then you need to replace with a SMOD part which is 100% on the price. (or if your in a 29er at the worlds, ders an argeument about dagger board padding! seriously - whats the deal with that!!) I have found the cherub to be cheaper to race than one-design. it is true, you cant knok it til youve tried it. It is a true addiction, a mix of light weight boat with a lot of rag = loads of fun, and a challenge to keep it upright! where as an 800 can be sailed by any tom dik and harry - so with cherubs, the real good sailors shine and the sh*te ones sink! A prime example of this wer a couple of lads at the 04 Nats, an old pre 97 rules all WOODEN boat, sailed well and still beating all carbon latest spec boats on the water! So ability is the most important issue - and then the ability to make a boat how you want it rather than having to change yourself to suit the boat!

-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 9:46pm

you need  lot of ability to beat people that have a faster boat than you

wit a cherab you have to keep pending money where in a 800 you do not you buy the boat you go and race



-------------


Posted By: KnightMare
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 9:54pm
Yeh but if you hve the skills and the boat isnt too harrible you still could be able to.

-------------
http://theramblingsofmyinnergeek.blogspot.com/


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 10:21pm

yse but you shoud give you self as bigger advanteg you can



-------------


Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 10:28pm
Originally posted by 5420

you sail with your mates and at the same time you are all going bankrupt



Lets think, major bits on current boat (the one in tha avatar) I bought a new main for my old Cherub 1988, I built the new boat and got a new mast, jib and kite in 89, kept the main from the other boat. I replaced the kite with an asymettric in '91, got a new jib in 92. I took three years of sailing it from 94, got another new jib in 98 after a rule change, and had the kite recut. 2001 I got a new mast, main and jib, 2003 a new kite and put in a mast stump, 2004 a new boom and bowsprit. 2003 I won the inlands, 2004 I took the "Pre 97" built boat prize at the Nationals.

Most SMOD sailors at my club have had four or five boats in that time.

I luv Wight is I think still on the same spars and main main on his 97 boat which has taken 3 championships, I think he's had two jibs and kites in that time.

I don't really think that sounds like bankruptcy - at least not compared to what the 29er sailors I know spend... The stuff about development class sailors spending a fortune is a myth, just the same as the one about SMOds having closer racing. When you do the research there's no great correlation between what people spend on boats and how tight the class rule set is, and similarly there's no correleation between the spread of finish times in the Champ fleet and how tight the rule is either.

If you want to sail one designs that's great, if you want to sail open rule boats that's great too, but the amount of money you spend or how close the racing is will have very little to do with that choice. There are plenty of good reasons to sail smods, the chief one being that you don't have to think about how to set up your boat (although that would be hell for me), but don't kid yourself that closer racing or cheaper costs are among them.


Posted By: KnightMare
Date Posted: 17 Mar 05 at 10:41pm

Now thats cleared things up. Definatly i think the amount spent on a boat changes by what class it is not what type it is. the make up of some boats means that they have to keep coming up with new sails and rigging to stay on top form. and others the boat and riggin will keep its edge for years. That is more based upon the way the boat was built (designed)

I think the thing was in a development class the changes could make the older boats obsolete, so you would have to shell out for each development, but if a class has been out for a while it will have leveled out a bit so the developments wont have as much affect, as they could have.

(please tell me if im wrong)



-------------
http://theramblingsofmyinnergeek.blogspot.com/


Posted By: andy_cherub
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 12:16am
Not at all - with changes in development it simply means the old boats can still be competive. Take Jim Champ, his cherub is an 1988 hull but still winning! If you did the same with an 1988 laser it will get killed on the circuit! Development means you can pretty much have the hull for life, just doing a little bit to make it latest spec rather than spending an absoulte fortune on a brand new boat.

-------------
-12ft skiff, Team 'CST Composites'
-Many thanks goes out to all of my sponsors.
Ignore my user name, my views are of a 12ft skiff


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 7:46am

what i do and i think a lot of people do is look at the number of boats that ar racing in that fleet if you think that boats like 29er can get over 50 at the indlands you have a biger chamce of geting close recing than a boat that gets say 10 at the inlands i do not know how maney a chearb gets but i do know that it is betwean 10-20



-------------


Posted By: KnightMare
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 10:18am

Ok i take back everythign that i said then.

Yeah the closeness of racing has to take into account not only the number of boats that race but also the spread of their ability. Some of the classes that have massive starts have all the boats from club levle to national level compeating. It just means that the starts are harder but that the 'closeness' of racing is still the same. But if you have a class where all the boats are of realy good ability then the racing is bound to be close reagrdless of how many boats there are.



-------------
http://theramblingsofmyinnergeek.blogspot.com/


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 11:33am

yaer say if you are in the laser nashanl squad you will have very close racing with the rest of the squad



-------------


Posted By: Granite
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 1:42pm

This topic has exploded since yesterday and there are so many things I want to say that I have forgotten most of them

Someone said that Development class sailors depend on thair cheque book and technology to win and not sailing skill. There is one cherub where the owner has built everything himself apart from the fittings and rope! Does that not take more skill than phoning up RS and quoting your credit card Number?

There is one (Soon to be two) cherub at the moment using a T-Foil rudder. Built by me in my garden shed with the complete carbon rudder and stock and tiller for a materials cost of between £150 and £200 I would be supprised if you could buy a 29er or 800 rudder for less than that.

The cherub does not have big fleets and sailing one takes a bit more commitment than sailing a one design, as with such a light weight hull they get damaged easily, but you easily develop the skill of repairing it yourself which is half the fun.

I enjoy thinking about hull shapes and rig designs and crew ergonomics and have more ideas for how to build boats than I can ever put into practice and that is all part of the fun of sailing a development class.

The One Designs have there place not everyone has the time or enthusiasum to sail a development class and the new breed of boats L400, RS800, 29er are not realy that bad but once you have sailed a real high performance boat Int14 or Cherub or A class Cat, and go back to a heavy one design you can realy feel the difference.

I weigh 12.5 stone and am 6ft 3.

 



-------------
If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 3:00pm

a 29er ruder is about £85 which is very resable



-------------


Posted By: Granite
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 4:52pm
Originally posted by 5420

a 29er ruder is about £85 which is very resable

That is quite a good price but does that include stock?

If you are wanting cheap sailing then Development classes are the way to go. You can pick up an old Int 14 or old Cherub for verry little money for the ammount of boat you get. If you are happy to be a couple of years behind in the development there is often second hand kit to buy. I know people who have sailed 14's for years and have never bought new sails they have always got cheap second hand ones.

When you race it is easy to see which boats are simelar age to you and can have good racing against them.  Beating a more modern boat is always a bonus.



-------------
If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 4:58pm
yer i think that would be cool beating a moden boat when your boat is like 10 years old!!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: Dave S
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 6:51pm

Originally posted by carshalton fc

yer i think that would be cool beating a moden boat when your boat is like 10 years old!!

Give it another year, and you will be able to (in 14s, anyway). There are Bieker IIs around which were built in 1996 and could still win any UK regatta. (I think top B2 was 4th in last year's nationals). And you regularly get to sail in fleets of 50+ at a Nationals and 88 at the last Worlds in NZ (next two will almost certainly be over 100). Contrast with your average SMOD, which doesn't have a UK circuit worth speaking of after 10 years, and probably never had an international circuit in the first place.

I'd far rather have a 10-year-old 14/Cherub which I can either race or sell into an active second-hand market, than an Iso/Boss/Laser 5000 which I can only race in a handicap fleet and has negligible resale value even if I could find someone to buy it...

Bottom line is that the competitive life of a development-class boat is typically longer than the life of a SMOD class...

 



Posted By: KnightMare
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 7:18pm

Yeah but as granite said one designs do have their place, I would love to sail a boat liek 14/cherub but i dont have the time or 'money' to start sailing one, also at the moment ji dont have enough time to seriously look at the class and work out what the boat should be like.

I think if i have understood everything everyone has said, you dont necerly have to have deep pockets for a development class but have to keep your eyes and ears open to what is changing in the class if youwant you boat to be 'up there'. If you have the motivation and ability to keep the boat up to standard then you aught to choose a class like that but other wise a one design seems like a good idea as a boat jsut to get you on the water at weekends etc. You can have good national circuits (not nec. International) if you want to become more competative.

 

As I have said before lots of what I say may be getting the wrong end of the stick as most of the things I know about development classes has come from reading this forum, Since Cadets are a RYA youth class all the boats we were kind of aimed into after them were all the 420 and 29er style boats with high youth training. Could some one clear up a few things like which boats are one design and which are development, I have picked up the ones that are mentioned on here a lot, But I know I will make a mistake along the way if i dont ask now.



-------------
http://theramblingsofmyinnergeek.blogspot.com/


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 7:57pm
thats very true what you have just said knightmare!!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 7:58pm

Development classes - Merlin Rocket, National 12, International 14, Cherub and Moth.  But there are other classes where a little bit of tweeking is allowed, generally this is limited to cockpit layout and they tend to be the older One Designs that were built in wood, examples are, Scorpion, Wayfarer, Osprey Flying Dutchman, Hornet, Fireball, Phantom, Solo, but we should also include the Europe here.  Then there are the very strict One Designs, often called SMOD (Single Manufacturer One Design), of which the Laser is the best example but all the boats from Laser, RS and Topper fall into this category.

No doubt I've missed a few and got some small detail wrong but others will contribute I'm sure.  But I'm sure you get the drift.



Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 8:04pm
i think that in one designs you should be able to change little things in the cockpit only!

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 8:17pm

Well in the Laser you aren't even allowed to put some tape at the corners of the transom to stop the mainsheet catching.  You have to admit that such strict rules have produced a succesful boat.

PS I'm at the club on Sunday.



Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 18 Mar 05 at 8:24pm
yes it has produced a succesfull boat but there are little things on boats that after a while start to annoy you!

-------------
International 14 1503



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com