What kind of crazy rule is this?
Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: Dinghy classes
Forum Name: Dinghy development
Forum Discription: The latest moves in the dinghy market
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2625
Printed Date: 18 Aug 25 at 11:46am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: What kind of crazy rule is this?
Posted By: FireballNeil
Subject: What kind of crazy rule is this?
Date Posted: 24 Jan 07 at 3:32pm
Taken from the 29er worlds news on the home page;
At 2pm the wind registered 37 knots, a speed that exceeds the maximum of 25 knots established in the rules of the 29er Class World Championship
Now I'm in one of the lightest Fireball teams going at just under 19stone all up and we raced in 25+ knots on sunday and it was the most fun I have ever had in the boat since we got it. Why deprive the 29er saioors of the challenge and thrill of this much wind?
------------- Neil
|
Replies:
Posted By: sailor.jon
Date Posted: 24 Jan 07 at 3:41pm
Seems strange, are there any other classes that have this sort of rule?
You'd think that if your racing a 29er then you sailing skill should enable you to sail safely in 25 knots
------------- Jon
Vortex 1169
http://www.yorkshiredales.sc/ - Yorkshire Dales Sailing Club
|
Posted By: FireballNeil
Date Posted: 24 Jan 07 at 3:48pm
my thought exactly to be honest! It's in 25 knows where the good really shine out from the rest! Unlike me on the sundy mentioned above GYBE MARK!
------------- Neil
|
Posted By: high-lander
Date Posted: 24 Jan 07 at 4:19pm
Appendix 4 of B14 class rules state
Appendix 4
- Event Rules
a. The minimum wind speed for
starting will be that in which the race committee considers the boats have
sufficient capability for pre-start manoeuvres
b. Races should not start, or races
in progress should be abandoned when:
i wind gusts exceed 25 knots for
more than 30 seconds
ii wind gusts exceed 30 knots for
any duration
iii the race committee considers
conditions are unsafe for sailing The 49er class rules say exactly the same thing (word for word) in their appendix #2
|
Posted By: Villan
Date Posted: 24 Jan 07 at 4:40pm
Oh How Boring!!!
------------- Vareo - 149 "Secrets"
http://www.TandyUKServers.co.uk" rel="nofollow - TandyUK Servers
|
Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 24 Jan 07 at 4:48pm
We just have a minimum wind rule... much more sensible
------------- http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb
|
Posted By: Guest
Date Posted: 24 Jan 07 at 5:02pm
I think the 49er has that too.
We used to have it in the Musto rules but dropped it as we like sailing in the breeze too...
Now we have the below;
1.2. Races should not start, or races in progress should be abandoned when:
(a) The race committee considers conditions are unsafe for sailing. (b) The wind is less than 4 Knots for more than 5 minutes.
-------------
|
Posted By: mike ellis
Date Posted: 24 Jan 07 at 5:39pm
why have a maximum wind rule? thats just silly. isnt the bit in the SIs about by launching you signify that you are happy to sail in the conditions designed to stop people going out in conditions in which they wont survive? surely they have this in the SIs for the 29er worlds?
------------- 600 732, will call it Sticks and Stones when i get round to it.
Also International 14, 1318
|
Posted By: MRJP BUZZ 585
Date Posted: 24 Jan 07 at 6:04pm
I guess the idea is to stop the really light crews being completely disadvantaged when it is high wind and they can;t sail it whereas the heavier crews can pick up marks just for getting round the course
------------- Josh Preater
http://www.bu22.co.uk"> BUZZING IS FUN
|
Posted By: Skiffman
Date Posted: 24 Jan 07 at 6:10pm
it was not really a rule more of a guideline, race officers would sail us until like any class the fleet can not handle it anymore, At San Fran worlds in 2005 there were quite a few races that officially would have breached this rule. It was only made a big deal last summer when in the middle of a race the wind dissapeared and half the competitors were timed out. So they all protested and re ran the race.
I think its for race officiers that have never been a race officier for 29er, 49er etc and a guide for them.
heres a pic from san fran in one of the morning light wind races....

------------- 49er GBR5
http://www.teamfletcherandsign.co.uk - teamfletcherandsign.co.uk
Team Fletcher and Sign campaign site
|
Posted By: 49erGBR735HSC
Date Posted: 24 Jan 07 at 9:34pm
Think the general idea behind the rule is so that rescues crews are not stretched. Say you have 50 49ers turn up at reggatta, wind gets pretty nasty and only the top half of the fleet can cope with the conditions, you are now in the situation where 20 odd 49ers could be needing assistance, not good for the reputation of the class and also quite dangerous. It isn't because the boats aren't sailable in those conditions and people can't handle the boats, it's just safer not to advise racing in them.
------------- Dennis Watson 49er GBR735 http://www.helensburghsailingclub.co.uk/ -
Helensburgh S.C
http://www.noblemarine.co.uk/home.php3?affid=560 - Boat Insurance from Noble Marine
|
Posted By: Matt Jackson
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 1:04pm
It's not possible to gauge the wind strength at some venues from the beach though so it might look OK but when you get out there...
Also there is a lot of peer pressure to go out when it's windy and some crews may feel they have to go out when really it isn't safe to because of their skill-level (I don't think weight has much to do with it over 25kts). Generally speaking the younger you are the worse you are at judging risk so it makes sense for junior fleets.
------------- Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
Posted By: Hector
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 1:33pm
Originally posted by MRJP BUZZ 585
I guess the idea is to stop the really light crews being completely disadvantaged when it is high wind and they can;t sail it whereas the heavier crews can pick up marks just for getting round the course |
As Matt says above, weight has little to do with it in 'survival' conditions. There are many races I can recall when most of the lardies had to be rescued or run for the beach while the good light sailors were still getting round the course.
Why the same rule for 29er as 49er? They are significantly different boats - I've seen 29ers sailed really well in 30kts but even the very best 49ers will struggle in that much wind.
If it's a guidline - that should be made clear and race officers should consult class reps as several factors come in to play. For instance,
- a Worlds fleet should be far more capable than say a Nationals or Regional or Inlands fleet where some relatively inexperienced crews will be competing.
- 30 knots inland should be easier / safer than 25 kts in say Hayling Bay - especially if the Bar is pumping!
|
Posted By: Merlinboy
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 1:42pm
Some very valid points to the arguement, i think we have to remebr that sailing can be a dangerous sport especially in big winds on open water, i seem to oremeber owain getting recued by the rnli in his 49er he was in the water for a long time imagine if you had 5 boats all in the same situation. Gone are the days of being able to sail a dinghy in any wind in a wollie jumper.
-------------
|
Posted By: Adds
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 3:19pm
I agree with Hector.
"30 knots inland should be easier / safer than 25 kts in say Hayling Bay - especially if the Bar is pumping!"
However it does take a lot of responsibility away from the PRO. Which makes it a lot easier for them, so that you don't arguing/fighting between sailors. And the sailors know if a race race is going to be run or not so you can pack your boat up early.
------------- Cheers Dudes
|
Posted By: Stefan Lloyd
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 3:46pm
Ever tried anchoring a committee boat in, say, 25 knots in Hayling Bay?
I think there are a lot of "fishermen's tales" about how much breeze people have sailed in. A continuous 25 knots (as opposed to gusts) is a solid blast of wind. 30 knots will have most racing keelboats heading home, let alone dinghies.
The other consideration for a championship is that racing in 25 knots plus will inevitably cause a lot of damage. Pressure to go out early in the championship in a lot of breeze could easily spoil the whole event for a lot of people. You are there to have fun, not to break the boat on day 1 and go home.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 4:29pm
Yep, I personally wouldn't consider dinghy racing at any coastal venue in over 25 knots steady. That's a great deal of breeze. On a big lake in the right boat with the right crew then yes, I have done it, but not regularly.
|
Posted By: MikeBz
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 5:58pm
It has to be borne in mind that many (relatively) modern boats such as the 29er, B14 and 49er are much more heavily canvassed than older craft (e.g. Fireball) which means their maximum manageable windspeed will be lower. It doesn't blow that hard that often, and the more heavily canvassed the boat the more fun you'll be having further down the wind range - ergo most of the time more sail is more fun.
Mike
|
Posted By: aardvark_issues
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 6:02pm
I think it might be for (AUS based) insurance reasons... Apparently if you go
out in 25knots+ your insurance is not valid.
Most of the classes listed had rulesets bourne out of Australia but perhaps
someone from down under can clarify?
|
Posted By: combat wombat
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 6:45pm
Originally posted by Stefan Lloyd
I think there are a lot of "fishermen's tales" about how much breeze
people have sailed in. A continuous 25 knots (as opposed to gusts) is a
solid blast of wind. 30 knots will have most racing keelboats heading
home, let alone dinghies.
|
Couldn't agree more. People always over-estimate the windspeed -
people also forget that the power of the wind is exponential - ie the
difference between 25 and 30 knots is not the same as between 10 and 15
knots. 25 is just about manageable, 30 is not. I've sailed
offshore in 40 knots of wind (as measured by the NQE instruments) and
will never, ever repeat it if possible. With no sail up, just
rotating the mast to use the surface area of it we were flying at 23
knots average (40ft Multi).
------------- B14 GBR 772
|
Posted By: blaze720
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 7:09pm
25kn reliably measured is generally stronger than many dinghy sailors "30-40+ knots at least" claims. Like combat wombat I've done offshore in 40+ - you cannot see very much, communicate to anyone on deck except with rudimentary hand signals etc etc. Its definately much more than casually dangerous even in the 'right' boat. After a while the sea state alone in 30+ will be dangerous to the vast majority of dinghy crew and a liability for rescuers and race team alike.
Let the RO make an informed judgement at the time - but 25kn constant is not a bad dividing line for them to start considering all factors and considerations and what might just happen.
Blaze 720
|
Posted By: Jack Sparrow
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 7:13pm
Originally posted by JimC
Yep, I personally wouldn't consider dinghy racing at any coastal venue in over 25 knots steady. That's a great deal of breeze. On a big lake in the right boat with the right crew then yes, I have done it, but not regularly. |
hang on.... you used to sail a Cherub ( with a pre 05 rig ) noted for being crap in no wind ( lets say under 13 knots ) - but also noted for being fantastic in big breeze! Add to this the fact that you weren't the smallest of Cherub crews and you must of had a crap time for all those years if you didn't go out over 25knts! That's quite a small window to hit. What made you do it!
Big !
------------- http://www.uk3-7class.org/index.html" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Class Website
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092602470772759/" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Building - Facebook Group
|
Posted By: aardvark_issues
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 7:19pm
Originally posted by combat wombat
I've sailed offshore in 40 knots of wind (as measured by the NQE
instruments) and will never, ever repeat it if possible. With no sail up, just
rotating the mast to use the surface area of it we were flying at 23
knots average (40ft Multi).
|
Sounds like one of my old mans stories! Nothing scarier than a big multihull
in those winds...
|
Posted By: combat wombat
Date Posted: 25 Jan 07 at 8:57pm
Originally posted by aardvark_issues
Sounds like one of my old mans stories! Nothing scarier than a big multihull
in those winds...
|
Just impossible to slow down, we used drogues, sea anchors etc but no
joy. Steering had to be picture perfect to stop it pitchpoling at
the bottom of every wave. In the end we turned around and beat
slowly to windward with storm jib up instead of risking a nasty
pitchpole surfing downwind - there were only two of us that could
reliably steer and we were both fully ready to collapse! Still
flying a hull under storm jib to windward it was that windy.
Above 25 knots, the wind is an awesome force to be reckoned with.
------------- B14 GBR 772
|
Posted By: vscott
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 10:03am
Isn't it to do with the fact that modern skiff type boats rigs are not designed to be de-powered and de-powered to survive comfortably if the wind really gets up. It is much harder to simply 'survive' in a skiff than a traditional dinghy shape and rig.
Therefore it makes some sense not to send them out in conditions that could turn nasty and potentially cause damage and injury. Particulary in this litigeous age.
------------- Mk IV Osprey 1314 Think Again
Kielder Water Sailing Club
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 10:52am
Originally posted by vscott
It is much harder to simply 'survive' in a skiff than a traditional dinghy shape and rig. |
Err, no.
|
Posted By: Merlinboy
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 11:32am
I would of thought an osprey is a bit of a hand full in a blow!
-------------
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 11:46am
Originally posted by turnturtle
...but then we were sailing 420s |
A skiff style gust reponsive rig of the same size would be far more survivable than a conventional 420 one. I've sailed the exact same boat with a variety of rig configurations and the flexi top skiff style double spreader rig was by far the most survivable. We could probably handle another 5 knots at the top end. By contrast comparing survivability in a 29er or a 420 is like comparing apples and orang-utans.
|
Posted By: Beast of Bodmin
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 11:52am
Of all the boats I've sailed in that wind the RS600 is streaks ahead for grin factor and ease
|
Posted By: 422797
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 11:52am
The thing about racing modern skiffs such as the 49er or the 29er is there is no off button. I have sailed in a 49er waiting for a start in the high teens windspeed struggling to keep the boat under controll while fireballs and other boats were sat with sails out in the boat eating a chocolate bar.
I think it is not that a fireball is easier to race than a 49er but rather if it all gets out of hand getting ashore in the 9er or a proper modern skiff becomes very difficult.
You regulalry hear stories of even the best 49er sailors having to be towed in by RNLI etc not because they were not good enough but because a small thing went wrong and when that happens there is little to be done.
I personally have been out and the wind got up a lot - probably a little under 25knots and it was early into my 49er sailing - we were going upwind, away from the shore, literally unable to bear away and unable to get into the boat as it needed both on the wire to stay upright much of the time. in the end we had to capsize and take the main down in the water, rolling it and fighting with it the whole way. This worked but we were swimming for a long time and we were lucky it was summer. If there were say 6 boats doing this in the middle of winter the likelihood of someone getting hypothermia seems rather high.
|
Posted By: 49erGBR735HSC
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 12:07pm
Originally posted by vscott
Isn't it to do with the fact that modern skiff type boats rigs are not designed to be de-powered and de-powered to survive comfortably if the wind really gets up. It is much harder to simply 'survive' in a skiff than a traditional dinghy shape and rig.
Therefore it makes some sense not to send them out in conditions that could turn nasty and potentially cause damage and injury. Particulary in this litigeous age.
|
You are on to the right train of thought, however, the rigs are designed to be deopowered extensively. The ability to depower the rig on say something like the 49er in my opinion is much greater than on classes like the 505 and Osprey. However, boats of more traditional design don't react so much to changes in acceleration, 2 sail reaching on the 49er becomes a bit of a mine field in comparison to doing the same on a traditional boat due to the increased rate that the boat hits top end speed with minimal hull resistance to keep the bow up. Boats like the 49er sail best when they are balanced so powering up, dumping, powering up, dumping, knocks all the balance out and makes it more difficult to sail. The traditional classes depower and deal with conditions by dumping, which you simply don't do. It's better to be sailing full speed in 20 kts of breeze and to be hit by a 30 kts gust because the wind speed difference is 10 kts which is also reduced if you're boat speed is greater than the wind speed, where as if you dumped power and the boat is sailing at 10kts, you are subjected to a 20 kts gust instead of a 10kts gust. There are times when we have been sailing flat out in constantly high wind conditions of above 25 kts with our main set perfectly and when a gust hits, the battens invert slightly as the top section flexes, at that stage the rig is deciding to slightly depower on our behalf, then it powers up as the forces on the sail decrease slightly. The key factor is to keep the boat going fast and in conditions above 25 kts, gut instinct tells you to back off and you just have to keep driving faster and faster. For safety's sake, when we are sailing in those conditions, I'll pass slower boats to leeward in case we are forced over so the rig doesn't land on their boats. If we go to windward, we give a passing distance of at least the length of the mast between the boats. In those instances, doubt boat on boat racing would be ideal as the passing distances have to be greater for safety reasons and that might be part of the driver between upper wind limit conditions being applied to class rules.
------------- Dennis Watson 49er GBR735 http://www.helensburghsailingclub.co.uk/ -
Helensburgh S.C
http://www.noblemarine.co.uk/home.php3?affid=560 - Boat Insurance from Noble Marine
|
Posted By: Merlinboy
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 12:14pm
TT, i am of ample proportions lets borrow a osprey in 25 gusting 30 and see how easy it is could be good fun
-------------
|
Posted By: Pierre
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 12:29pm
Originally posted by Merlinboy
TT, i am of ample proportions lets borrow a osprey in 25 gusting 30 and see how easy it is could be good fun |
No sweat, you'd breeze it 
|
Posted By: Merlinboy
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 12:37pm
I dunno piere I bought an old ospry for the combi it was on it looked scarier then a 9er! With it being an old dog as well it must have weighed a tonne 5 blokes couldnt lift ot off the trailer without straining
-------------
|
Posted By: Pierre
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 12:40pm
Nah, I put mine back on its trolley on my own last weekend. Yours must have had the beer fridge still stocked....
|
Posted By: Pierre
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 12:47pm
Originally posted by turnturtle
Is this a reflection of the hull shape in the sea state, rather than the rig in the breeze? Or is it a simple fact that it's a different mindset as dennis says- we powered down by dumping main, lots of main, when the old boots were blowing....
|
These were my thoughts as well, especially hull shape. I guess technique is all important but I'd be interested in comments from Jim.
|
Posted By: BigFatStan
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 1:22pm
I've been out in an Osprey in 35 knots - very very fast, very very fun, very very stupid - of course I was younger then... my concern was when the old man in the back said "put the pole on sonny" - my response is not for the tender eyes that might be looking here...
I've also been out in a 420 in similar - approx 30 stone in the boat and that was insane - the rudder was 100% ineffective, which was nice.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 1:42pm
There are a lot of things...
Not the least of it is that the modern boats just plain have a lot of rag. For instance a 29er is carrying much the same size sails as a 470 on a far smaller boat.
Then modern high speed hulls do get a lot of their stability from speed, and waterline beam is forever getting narrower. Step into a 470 in no wind and its like a catamaran compared to a 29er. It can't help being more forgiving and easier to handle at low speeds with everything let out.
And of course sheer speed brings its own problems. Put a 29er and a 470 side by side in wind and waves and sheet both in together. The 29er's probably 100 yards ahead with its bow stuffed in the back of a wave by the time the 470s got on the plane.
Rig advances over the last 70 years or whatever have seen the amount of sail that can be crried increase and increase. Back in the 1950s it was common for I14s to use Firefly sails in heavyweather races!
And there's the safety cover/clothing factor. In 1930s clothing - wooly jumpers and waxed cotton, and a 1930S safety boat that would maybe do 5 knots, most modern Championship would have half the sailors down with exposure after an hour... So boats can and do push the limits far harder.
So all in all, even in spite of the more managable rig a 29er is far more difficult to handle than a 470 in 30 knots of wind. But the 470 is far more fun in 5 to 25 knots. Sounds like a good choice to me!
There is an off button though with skiff types - pull the jib to windward. Steadies the boat considerably at low speed. But 49ers and 29ers aren't generally equipped with backing lines to let you do it.
|
Posted By: combat wombat
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 2:09pm
Originally posted by JimC
There is an off button though with skiff types - pull the jib to windward. Steadies the boat considerably at low speed. But 49ers and 29ers aren't generally equipped with backing lines to let you do it.
|
I wouldn't do that in the B14 (it is possible due to non self tacking jib). The jib is over 5 sq/m and quickly overpowers the small rudder and makes life very hard.
------------- B14 GBR 772
|
Posted By: 422797
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 2:23pm
Definately does not work. get a crew into the boat to back the jib in big breeze and you are swimming simple as that. Though I take your point in say a 400 or similar.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 3:56pm
Originally posted by 422797
Definately does not work. |
Worked just fine in my Cherub... Invert the battens, back the jib gently and you can stooge around reasonably under control. Not a technique for after the 10 minute gun admittedly, but good for a break between races...
|
Posted By: 49erGBR735HSC
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 4:00pm
The best way to depower skiffs is through the cunningham, makes a whole world of difference, it's not so much of an off button but has almost the same affect as putting a reefing slab in a leadmine, just adds more control. The major trade off is between keeping the rig powered up and keeping the bow up. Very narrow margin for error, so being precise and more subtle about depowering is the key. Older classes weight seems to have made the difference, as such in the Osprey, where as in the likes of the 49er its about how precise your actions are.
------------- Dennis Watson 49er GBR735 http://www.helensburghsailingclub.co.uk/ -
Helensburgh S.C
http://www.noblemarine.co.uk/home.php3?affid=560 - Boat Insurance from Noble Marine
|
Posted By: blaze720
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 4:34pm
It's all about full battened main verses semi full width batten set up. The traditional classes mainly had 'soft' sails - later ones mainly fully battened. When it blows you cannot feather a fully battened one as easily as the sail always wants to drive - the leading edge cannot flutter as easily as the battens hold the camber in place and prevent it from collapsing as the boat is feathered closer to the wind. Beyond a point trying to feather a fully battened rig is counter productive - it creates additional drag as the crew eases the main or screws up into wind.
We went through this debate with the Blaze about 6 years ago - it was a right pig in any real breeze and we had to do something. Got talking to an early 800 helm and asked him why the boat had both full and short battens (relatively unusual at the time) - he did not know at the time but said that at least you could feather the main in wind. We tried the concept on the Blaze, just retaining 2 full length battens up top and going for short ones lower down. This lead to a slight reduction in sail area BUT the result was great high wind handling. The class switched and has never looked back - it allowed 'average' club racers to really enjoy windy days racing with confidence rather than trepidation and without sacrificing too much performance. It's still a fast boat ina breeze but many more can extract the potential performance now.
If you are fully battened then all you can do is crank on the cunningham windsurfer style but a desperately flat sail can still be a handfull in both puffs and lulls. The only exception that I've tried to this generalisation is the Tasar - easily managed in a good blow but they have low batten tension, a very modest sail plan, modest roach and a bendier mast than most. I'm fairly sure if more skiff types used a semi-rigid main (like the 800) they would prove much easier in a blow. The alternative is a lot less sail area but who wants that !
Blaze 720
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 5:36pm
Originally posted by 49erGBR735HSC
The best way to depower skiffs is through the cunningham, makes a whole world of difference, it's not so much of an off button but has almost the same affect as putting a reefing slab in a leadmine, just adds more control. The major trade off is between keeping the rig powered up and keeping the bow up. Very narrow margin for error, so being precise and more subtle about depowering is the key. Older classes weight seems to have made the difference, as such in the Osprey, where as in the likes of the 49er its about how precise your actions are.
|
Yep Cunningham is king - on cats we've been downhauling sails to death when windy for years - works a treat !
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 6:21pm
Originally posted by blaze720
It's all about full battened main verses semi full width batten set up. |
I've yet to hear a Solo sailor come off the water cursing his uncontrollable rig.
There's always been this theory about semi soft sails in the UK... Reckon you'd get laughed off the park in Aus and NZ! I just don't recognise the problem, but I've been sailing full battened rigs for thirty years.
|
Posted By: blaze720
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 8:33pm
And old board sailors like me were doing it decades ago with fully battened rigs as was the Tasar and of course you can add the Solo to the list. But amongst dinghies what do we know that goes particulaly well in a blow and yet is still relatively 'easy' ? - well 505, Fireball, Contender, 420 etc ... and they frequently revel in conditions that have club level sailors in fully battened boats staying in the boat park or putting the support crews through their paces. (And I'll add the Blaze to that list given my obvious bias - but I do the Tasar thing as well when it blows.
Want the majority of the fleet to get excited about higher winds and not just the elite ? then perhaps a more adaptable semi-soft rig is the way to go. The 800 is no slouch either - it was given that rig for a reason against the trend at the time and RS got that right.
Blaze 720
|
Posted By: FireballNeil
Date Posted: 26 Jan 07 at 10:41pm
This is sailing
http://www.ltsc.co.uk/ - http://www.ltsc.co.uk/
Talk about windy weather! I know the Fireball sailors that went to this event and they were the only boat upright at one point!
------------- Neil
|
Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 29 Jan 07 at 7:11am
I am surprised none of our antipodean forumites have chipped in - the source of the rule has nothing to do with how well different boats can cope with that much wind.
The no sailing above 25kts, as I understand it, is exceedingly common in sailing instructions for sailing clubs in Aus due to the influence of the insurance companies. Given that the 49er and 29er come out of that environment it does not surprise me that the rule is there...
------------- One step forwards, 2 steps back...
|
Posted By: Pabs
Date Posted: 29 Jan 07 at 11:10pm
I kind of agree with the rule but I do think it should be more of a
combination of things for example at this years and last years 300
nationals the wind was possibly around the 24K speed, but then you put
colossal waves in there it becomes really hard work and the lardy boys do
well although I am one of the lightest 300 B rig sailors.
I could handle 25k winds on a pond but really struggle at sea. The worst
thing is the newbie’s to the boat at a nationals often don’t bother going
out and if you have that kind of wind and waves for two days in a row it
can become very disappointing and more likely to cause damage from
your self capsizing and hitting the main and its buy buy mast track and
your nacked.
I do agree with the minimum wind strength angle tho as I went to a
L**htning open last year a bit over weight and the race officer started the
race on a mirror so low wind limit good max wind venue specific for me.
------------- Boatless and Clubless
|
Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 30 Jan 07 at 12:18am
These modern skiff type boats seem to be very easy to depower compared with the older designs. The only trouble is they also tend to have less stable hulls. The net result is that they revel in strong winds but once things go wrong you're in trouble.
I took my 4000 to Garda a few years ago. One day was reputed to be 29Knots but being Garda the wind was smooth and, dare I say it, it was manageable, just. But after a capsise it was very difficult to get going again. You have to sail these boats at 100% in those conditions whereas the more conventional boats allow you to sail a bit conservatively and survive.
I have to mention though that it was fantastic, planning upwind at quite some speed the boat sometimes leaped off one wave missed the next and crash into the next. Frightening for the structure of the boat, terrifying for those on board and I wouldn't have missed it for the world.
|
Posted By: m_liddell
Date Posted: 31 Jan 07 at 12:45pm
Does anyone believe the impressive footage in Higher and Faster of the 800 is really 35knts? That is a F8!
Going back to depowering with the jib, "High Performance Sailing" says a good way to dump a lot of power is ease the jib until it backwinds but isn't flapping. You lose the power without increasing drag too much (in theory!). I have yet to try this though.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 31 Jan 07 at 2:50pm
Originally posted by m_liddell
Does anyone believe the impressive footage in Higher and Faster of the 800 is really 35knts? That is a F8 |
Well there are two sorts of 35 knot winds aren't there... In all but very special conditions the wind at sea level is gusty, and the gusts greatly exceed the average wind speed.
There is an average 35knot breeze in which one would routinely expect 45 and 50 knot gusts with the occasional gust maybe up to 70 knots, and the 20knots breeze in which you'd routinely expect 35knot gusts... As we sailors are as fond of the big fish story as anyone else, we usually describe 20knots with 35 gusts as being 35 knots, not 20.
|
Posted By: Skiffybob
Date Posted: 31 Jan 07 at 5:52pm
Interesting little thread this is turning into guys...
For my 4-penny's worth, I would say that first of all there is a difference between "de-powering" and "dumping power". With any rig, as the breeze gets up you want to start to de-power. This is a gently and progressive action, and in here you guys are right when you say that a "skiff-type" rig is more flexible and easier to de-power. However what people usually struggle with when it's windy are the gusts, and this is where hard rigs can be a problem (because of the nature of the hard,fully-battened sail, you get this very on/off situation. Either the main is set and driving, or it's inverted and not driving), so if you ease out in the gusts you simply start to hobby-horse. With soft sails you can "feather" them more in the gusts, allowing them to luff a little but still keeping some drive on.
Regarding your comment about the jib Jim, I used to do this on the Cherub too with good effect, but on something like a B14 (or certainly on the 12ft Skiff), it'll just bin you straight in because the jibs are so much more powerful.
Hopefully see you orrible lot at the Dinghy show....
|
Posted By: Granite
Date Posted: 31 Jan 07 at 9:53pm
Modern rigs are adjustable enough to let you depower and stay in control of much more rag than was possible before.
When the rig is depowered and you are moving quickly I think even large gusts are OK as long as you are agressive. I do not think that a fully battned sail is any more difficult or on off when you are powered and moving. It will still flog inside out in the gusts just like a soft sail.
The problem is manuvers when all that extra rag gets pushed into a powerful shape by the stiff battens. As soon as you tip it in you can get stuck in a knightmare getting started again.
I think the rule also has a lot to do with safety boats, it takes a very powerful moter to be able to cope with large flogging sails.
------------- If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right
|
Posted By: Stefan Lloyd
Date Posted: 01 Feb 07 at 7:01am
Originally posted by JimC
As we sailors are as fond of the big fish story as anyone else, we usually describe 20knots with 35 gusts as being 35 knots, not 20.
|
Yes. I've sailed for 25 years and only been in steady 35 knots three times (as evidenced by wind instruments). One of those was during a Cowes Week, most boats retired, more than one sank, and several sailors went for unscheduled swims off big boats (all were lucky enough to be picked up by other boats).
I've been in steady 45 knots just once and a sailor drowned during the race following a knock-down. The bottom six feet of atmosphere were full of spray - it almost looked like mist - which is a thing I've not seen at any other time. These are serious amounts of breeze even for big boats and not most people's idea of fun in reality.
|
Posted By: allanorton
Date Posted: 01 Feb 07 at 3:12pm
Originally posted by JimC
Well there are two sorts of 35 knot winds aren't there... |
Also 35 knots on the sea can be quite different to 35 knots on a reservoir
-------------
|
Posted By: Matt Jackson
Date Posted: 05 Feb 07 at 5:06pm
Don't know about 35kts but I've sailed in 30mph average on both sea and pond and I'd much rather be on the sea. On a pond it's much more gusty and there's no waves to gybe on (Contenders don't granny very well).
------------- Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|