Print Page | Close Window

xenon' after race comments please*

Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: Dinghy classes
Forum Name: Dinghy development
Forum Discription: The latest moves in the dinghy market
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1111
Printed Date: 14 Aug 25 at 10:13pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: xenon' after race comments please*
Posted By: moontime
Subject: xenon' after race comments please*
Date Posted: 14 Oct 05 at 10:14pm

  Would like comments on the xenon, not just from the racing point of veiw




Replies:
Posted By: Jack Sparrow
Date Posted: 14 Oct 05 at 10:20pm
Are you thinking of purchasing one?

-------------
http://www.uk3-7class.org/index.html" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Class Website
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092602470772759/" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Building - Facebook Group


Posted By: moontime
Date Posted: 14 Oct 05 at 10:25pm

yes and no

just try to make a chosse between half a dozon boats

L2000 RS VISIION ETC

got to be big enough for the wife and maybe to small kids



Posted By: Jack Sparrow
Date Posted: 14 Oct 05 at 10:44pm
For me it falls a bit between two stalls. Although it is pretty heavy it does
get up a go. And isn't handling vice free. So if you are thinking about
more of a cruiser with the kids, put the tucker in the dry boxes (not so
dry on the one we had) e.t.c For me it isn't stable enough. If you are
thinking about club racing I think there are boats that are more refined
out there. Have a look on the Endeavour thread for other comments, as I
don't feel I should say to much publicly, positively or negatively. As
topper and The Royal Corinthian did a dam good job of organising the
event and without them the event wouldn't happen. It is a pretty tall ask
to get a boat to suit all competing classes and it was a good boat for the
task. best thing to do is sail them all.

-------------
http://www.uk3-7class.org/index.html" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Class Website
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092602470772759/" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Building - Facebook Group


Posted By: Philsy
Date Posted: 17 Oct 05 at 8:41am
Interesting feedback. so you reckon the Xenon isn't a good choice as a fast
family boat?

Phil

-------------


Posted By: Jack Sparrow
Date Posted: 17 Oct 05 at 7:04pm
No I think its fine as a fastish hassel free family boat. Could may be do
with a little better detailing in only one of two areas but its built for a
price, and that's fine. I was just saying that in my opinion, most people
that take the family out would want a little more stability. It's quite a big
rig and as a father knowing what it is like with the kids on board I think it
could be a handful. But I'm not that big (11st, wife is 8st) so it's a bit
different for me. If you were good sized adults it is maybe a different
matter. But it isn't a sit back and chill boat unless you reef it which you
can do. So if you are a good size, an OK sailor, want to race and sail with
the family, hassel free I'm sure it going to be great.

But (and this is where I'm not sure about it) if you can't be bothered with
upkeep on a boat (it's sales USP...Rotomold), doesn't that suggest that
you won't sail very much and it will spend most of it's life in the garden
and then that suggests that you won't be the best sailor around which
means you would probably like something that isn't going to chuck you
and the family out into the wet stuff? see my point?

-------------
http://www.uk3-7class.org/index.html" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Class Website
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092602470772759/" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Building - Facebook Group


Posted By: Philsy
Date Posted: 17 Oct 05 at 8:06pm
Thanks, useful feedback. So something like a Vision could be a better bet?

Regarding the low upkeep, you could argue that it means you'll spend more
time on the water because you're not faffing around with gelcoat repair kits
and so end up being a better sailor...

-------------


Posted By: Marine Boy
Date Posted: 17 Oct 05 at 8:20pm
Originally posted by Jack Sparrow


But (and this is where I'm not sure about it) if you can't be bothered with
upkeep on a boat (it's sales USP...Rotomold), doesn't that suggest that
you won't sail very much and it will spend most of it's life in the garden
and then that suggests that you won't be the best sailor around which
means you would probably like something that isn't going to chuck you
and the family out into the wet stuff? see my point?
 
Have to disagree here JS. One of my reasonings for buying the Xenon was that as a busy family man my spare time is precious. I didn't want to spend it maintaining a boat - I want to spend the time sailing it, which is entirely opposite to your thinking. As I will be spending proportionately more time in the boat I will become a better sailor and less likely to dunk my family...


Posted By: Jack Sparrow
Date Posted: 17 Oct 05 at 8:35pm
MB...That's cool. I'm sure that's what the topper guys were thinking when
they put it together. And they are more likely to be right than me. I'm a
development sailor so it probably clouds my judgment on these things as
I like fiddling as much as sailing.

-------------
http://www.uk3-7class.org/index.html" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Class Website
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092602470772759/" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Building - Facebook Group


Posted By: Hector
Date Posted: 19 Oct 05 at 2:06pm

Another opinion - taken from another website

"Dare I say "it does what it says on the tin".
It was better than expected ...it is a heavy boat... GP14 weight ....good tanks for kids to sit on or out. Needs refining in certain areas like the jib sheet mounting tracks and cleats. Move the spinni cleat onto deck ... sort out kite downhaul patches to make the kite completely vanish into chute. 2 Dustbin sized hatches are excellent ....fit a small child in one! Looks Merlinish cos of the width but nowhere near as tippy as there is substantially more wetted area. Small furling jib good for kids. Any water in the boat goes out of the back tubes.
Zipper on main to reef it ...we didnt use it ..although tempted on Saturday!
The price should sell it.  Try before buy.

I think it fits the bill for the event perfectly - fine for racing and no-one had any massive advantage. (Obviously its rather more like an RS400 than a Cherub so its not an entirely level playing feild).



Posted By: Hector
Date Posted: 19 Oct 05 at 2:26pm

As far as the comparison Xenon vs Vision, I've sailed both and wouldn't like to choose - better to sail and test for yourself. I'd strongly suggest that as part of that test, you capsize both and make sure recovery isn't a problem. I haven't capsized either but if buying to sail with my family, I'd want to be sure that there were no issues with getting them upright and people back on board.

IMHO - The Xenon has a slightly racier feel, and it has racy features such as adjustable jib sheeting tracks, a mainsheet hoop (also good for hanging onto mid roll tack) and a ratchet on the mainsheet.

The Vision seemed steadier (I did have more weight aboard) has non adjusting jib cleat position (Leach tension is altered via a plate on the clew), mainsheet has no hoop or bridle so it's difficult to centre - that together with no ratchet leads to high mainsheet loads.

Both need to upgrade jib cleating system - the risk of remaining cleated after tack is high due to poor fitting(s).

Both are heavy - pulling up even a short slipway is quite tough - the final decision might even swing on which is lightest and therefore least likely to cause a hernia!

All said I couldn't make a recommendation - possibly because I wouldn't buy either - I'd get an RS200 or 400 depending on the weight of my intended crew!



Posted By: Philsy
Date Posted: 19 Oct 05 at 2:28pm
Thanks Hector - very useful.

I don't think a 200 or 400 would suit my family requirements at all. Only
other option is the L2000 which (I think) is lighter but more expensive

Phil

-------------


Posted By: moontime
Date Posted: 22 Oct 05 at 12:34pm
Thanks for the replys, a little disapointing about guarded comments *(topper are big boys)


Posted By: Norwegian winds
Date Posted: 09 Nov 05 at 9:40pm

The Xenon has a sail area which is 30% bigger than the Snipe (without gennaker), so to me it looks more like a try to build a PE-racer rather than a family/school boat. Or is the large sail area just another attempt to win the "specification battle"  (largest sail area sells)?   

For what experience level would the Xenon be suitable in, say, force 3-4? 

Does anyone know any suggested P/Y? 



-------------
Bjorn Olsson


Posted By: blaze720
Date Posted: 09 Nov 05 at 10:50pm

Well I got to sail one (rather poorly !) last month at Burnham and can only say that it was a surprise in many respects.  Few there would buy one themselves but the general feeling was that it was a remarkably good boat and ideal for its intended users.  It was also a good choice for the event and ensured close racing and in the conditions it could be more than pedestrian.  Yes its plastic and therefore a bit heavy but the general design was excellent, with good detailing in the main and it was without obvious vices.  We capsized it and its easily righted even allowing me to 'scoop' up the crew without busting a gut.  The only general problems were the angle of the jib cleats and the 'O' ring sealing of various hatches. Some damaged spinni poles were also seen and we in particular were unfortunate when a spreader end fitting decided to join us down on deck !  However there are really details, easily sorted by the manufacturer and their suppliers.  

Topper were brave to throw this new boat into this event and they pulled it off along with the club who did an outstanding job.  I won't buy one myself but its not really aimed at those of us lucky enough to have been there.  Who will buy it then  ?  Well just about everybody not racing 50 weekends each year might well look at it.  It's easy to sneer at this type of boat, 'plastic' manufacturers and their intended market but many of us are old enought to remember similar attitudes when the Mirror and later the Topper represented the 'new' .  But these boats transformed the market for small boats in the 60's and 70's and beyond for the better and introduced many tens of thousands to dinghy sailing and racing. 

Mike Lyons

 

 

 

 



Posted By: Marine Boy
Date Posted: 10 Nov 05 at 1:07pm
Originally posted by Norwegian winds

Does anyone know any suggested P/Y? 

 
 
1035


Posted By: Iain C
Date Posted: 16 Nov 05 at 9:34am

I test sailed one yesterday to help decide whether it would be a suitable replacement for Draycote's fleet of training Wayfarers.  I saw it sailing two-up first, and I have to say it did not seem very fast, instead it waved it's nose round in the air and kicked up a bit of spray, albeit from a heavy boat in a F2-3  That said, it would be plenty exciting enough for newcomers to the sport, you don't want something taking off at Mach 9 and falling over.

We then tried it four up (jumping in from a RIB with of course no concerns about damaging the rotomoulded hull) and in fairness although the performance was slightly dulled, it remained vice free and still sailed properly in a F2.  Not quite as much room as a Wayfarer, and more of an "on" boat than an "in" boat, but the gnav certainly freed up some room.

Very comfortable to hike, and light on the helm.  Could do with a webbing strap to get the board up, and I do worry that with the effort required to get it down, someone inexperienced might end up trapping their fingers under the "doorstop" blocks.  Non-slip has been moulded in, although the "urinal" style flecked plastic finish might not be to everyone's taste!

Forward hatch covers are a good idea but not strong enough, we managed to break one.  Spinlock kite cleat is a pain where it is on the ally crossbeam...it spins round and round getting the halyard caught, and I feel may get damaged as it is a little exposed.  Either put it somewhere else, or just revert to a standard cleat.

Hull is heavy but does look bomb-proof and well moulded.  Yesterday was cold and I feel the very crackly laminate sail might die in a big capsize, but it does have the option of a Dacron main for the training market.  Mainsheet is a pain in the backside...tons of friction, all caused I think by Toppers insistence of running the last fall from the boom through an additional block on the hoop instead of straight back to the ratchet.  The Holt wire-frame main jammer incidentally was a bit reluctant to spin round for some reason, and the thwart made a creaking sound accompanied by 5mm of movement at one end.

All in all though I do think it is a very well thought out package, not the type of boat for me personally, but as a family or training boat it's excellent.  The kite is easy to fly and you can carry it very high.  The boat is not stable in the same way as a Wayfarer, so it encourages skillful sailing from day 1, but it gets to 30 degrees or so and just stays there, so people are unlikely to swim.  Just a little but of time sorting out a few fitting-out niggles and Topper will have produced a very versatile little dinghy, especially for the training market.  You can take people for their first sail, then take them all the way up to racing level, and more importantly they are likely to want to come back after their course and hire the thing for a bit of blasting.

Oh, and it needs a longer main halyard please, it's about a metre to short.

 



-------------
RS700 GBR922 "Wirespeed"
Fireball GBR14474 "Eleven Parsecs"
Enterprise GBR21970
Bavaria 32 GBR4755L "Adastra"



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com