29er GBR 074 Tynemouth |
J24 (Sail No. 4239) Dartmouth |
Laurent Giles 'Jolly Boat' Exeter |
List classes of boat for sale |
Luffing (or not) |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |||
Sam.Spoons
Really should get out more Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3398 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Luffing (or not) Posted: 04 Mar 17 at 9:09am |
||
This is purely of academic interest as we all know that luffing is rarely worth the time lost unless it's a two boat race (as, effectively, the FF incident in the other thread was).
Quite a few years ago when I was racing Raceboards fairly seriously (regional and a couple of national series events a year) when the 'new rules' came in. I was told at a National event, in an informal discussion, by a 'rules expert' (he was on the RC and would have chaired the PC had a protest resulted from the incident) that the new rules effectively banned luffing.
The incident :- It's marginal planing conditions and board A is sailing in on a broad reach, spots/hears a gust coming from astern and also hears a following board (B) approaching, planing on said gust. A pumps onto the plane to pick up the same gust, heading up for pressure and shouting "windward board keep clear". Unsighted as he is to leeward of B he continues to plane on a higher than 'proper course' until, after his third hail 2-3 secs minimum) the two make contact. Ignoring the fact that it probably wasn't prudent to luff (but it was to head up for pressure) who should have been penalised? Before the 'new rules' it was pretty simple, you try to pass me to windward, I luff hard, you also luff to keep clear, then shout "mast abeam" and I stop luffing and sail for the mark. The only discussion can be if I think you shouted "mast abeam" too soon. Everybody knew that to try to sail over another boat close and to windward invited defensive action and sailed accordingly (i.e. not so close as to be unable to avoid the luff). |
|||
JimC
Really should get out more Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6649 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 04 Mar 17 at 9:26am | ||
It really hasn't changed much. The main thing that's changed is that its now prohibited to case course so fast and close that its physically impossible for the windward boat to keep clear. In the event that there's no contact its very unlikely that ROW would be penalised.
The main effect of the removal of the mast abeam rule is that windward boats should give more room. The idea of mast abeam, I think was that in the mast abeam position windward could not luff any further without the stern making contact as in the FF incident. With the rules as they are now if the boats get to that position windward has already broken a rule and will be penalised, so all leeward should do is hail protest. So the result is now that everybody should know that if you sail close and to windward and get luffed into a "can't turn any more without contact" position then you have broken the rule and need to take a penalty even though there's no contact and there's no mast abeam rule to get you out of gaol. And that means if you get luffed you need to get the hell out of there as quickly as you possibly can, because if you don't its very easy to end up in a place where you have no choice but to take a penalty. Edited by JimC - 04 Mar 17 at 9:49am |
|||
Sam.Spoons
Really should get out more Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3398 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 04 Mar 17 at 10:07am | ||
I assume onus of proof on rule 14 lies with the keep clear boat?
|
|||
JimC
Really should get out more Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6649 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 04 Mar 17 at 10:11am | ||
There is no onus of proof. The PC has to make its best judgement as to what happened.
|
|||
Sam.Spoons
Really should get out more Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3398 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 04 Mar 17 at 10:53am | ||
My original point was (and I'm looking at it from 50 years sailing boats and boards mostly at club and regional level) it's harder to make a clear decision on the water and you are more likely to have to resort to a protest committee to sort it out. That's fine at bigger meetings but protests are rare at many clubs and almost unheard of amongst Raceboards at club level.
I guess, as I become more familiar with the current RRS........ Thanks JC
|
|||
Brass
Really should get out more Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1146 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 04 Mar 17 at 11:41am | ||
Not real thrilled with that analysis. If L continuously luffs then bears away, without contact, then W is keeping clear, then L is giving W room to keep clear and no rules is broken. L has to straighten up and hold a steady course, and then 'need to take action (change course) to avoid [contact with] W' before L wins the rule 11 protest. If L hits W while L is turning, then, provided W is 'doing all she can', then L loses, and has not given W room to keep clear.
Key point of the rule changes (increasing prohibitions on contact, combined with introduction of alternative penalties) between about 1985 and 1995 was that the 'hard luff' and the 'luff trap' were outlawed. You can defend your wind, but you can't slam up and hit the windward boat and demand that they go home. Effectively this means that if you want to defend your wind, you need to do it before the overlap, so as to deter W from ever going there.
|
|||
Sam.Spoons
Really should get out more Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3398 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 04 Mar 17 at 1:09pm | ||
Yes, that's pretty much how I used to interpret it, in line with Eric Twiname's suggestion that a luff should be brief, hard and while still clear ahead so as to discourage another boat from passing to windward and taking your wind.
|
|||
Brass
Really should get out more Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1146 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 04 Mar 17 at 2:06pm | ||
|
|||
Sam.Spoons
Really should get out more Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3398 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 04 Mar 17 at 3:47pm | ||
None that I could see. In that instance I was A and didn't think I was in the wrong (gust, pump, head up both to defend and to get more pressure, Raceboards being apparent wind craft once planing). After the race I timed how long it took to hail three times and it must have been at least 6 seconds. Many windsurfers have a sketchy knowledge of the rules at best and don't like what they see as 'sharp dinghy practices' (I hasten to add this doesn't apply to the top guys but this was a national and I was around the front of the mid fleet (IIRC I finished in the mid 30's out of 200+).
The 'expert' said to the other guy that his protest would be thrown out because he did not hail "protest" at the time but told me had he done so he would have found in his favour (which, had it been me on the PC, I would not have done). As I said, I am returning to racing (other than some very informal stuff) after a good few years so I'm keen to get back up to speed on the RRS.
Edited by Sam.Spoons - 04 Mar 17 at 3:48pm |
|||
Brass
Really should get out more Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1146 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 Mar 17 at 2:01am | ||
|
|||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |